Skip to content

Review skatespotsmap data management across multiple databases #9

Description

@sktbrd

Context

The current skatespotsmap flow depends on more than two databases/data sources. That increases maintenance overhead, makes debugging harder, and creates extra complexity for future feature work.

Problem

  • Data for the map feature is spread across multiple databases
  • Ownership and source of truth are not clear enough
  • Sync, migration, and consistency risks increase as the feature grows
  • The current setup deserves a dedicated architecture review before it becomes harder to change

Goals

  • Audit all databases/data stores currently used by skatespotsmap
  • Document what each one stores and why it exists
  • Define a clearer source of truth for spot/map-related data
  • Identify opportunities to reduce the number of databases or simplify the integration boundaries
  • Propose a migration/refactor path with minimal product risk

Acceptance criteria

  • Current data architecture mapped and documented
  • Pain points and duplication risks identified
  • Recommendation written for consolidation or clearer separation of responsibilities
  • Follow-up implementation tasks created if structural changes are needed

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions