fix: use 'inactive' instead of 'departed' in report highlights

Developers missing from the latest report are on vacation or working
on other things, not departing. Updated prompt to never use 'departed'
or 'left' language. Cleared cached highlights to regenerate.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

Author: msogin

src/app/api/report-highlights/route.ts

@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ export async function GET(_req: NextRequest) {
 
   const allLogins = new Set([...mapA.keys(), ...mapB.keys()]);
   const newDevs = [...allLogins].filter(l => !mapA.has(l) && mapB.has(l));
-  const departedDevs = [...allLogins].filter(l => mapA.has(l) && !mapB.has(l));
+  const inactiveDevs = [...allLogins].filter(l => mapA.has(l) && !mapB.has(l));
 
   const formatDev = (d: any) =>
     `@${d.github_login} (rank #${d.rank}): commits=${d.total_commits}, PRs=${d.total_prs}, complexity=${Number(d.avg_complexity).toFixed(1)}, impact=${Number(d.impact_score).toFixed(1)}, AI%=${d.ai_percentage}`;
@@ -114,7 +114,8 @@ Compare two reports for the same org and period. Return JSON:
 
 Rules:
 - 3-5 bullet highlights max. Be specific — name developers, cite numbers.
-- Focus on: biggest movers (rank changes, impact delta), org-wide trends (commits, AI%, complexity), notable new/departed developers.
+- Focus on: biggest movers (rank changes, impact delta), org-wide trends (commits, AI%, complexity), newly active or recently inactive developers.
+- IMPORTANT: developers missing from the latest report are NOT "departed" — they are simply inactive in this period (vacation, different projects, etc). Never use words like "departed" or "left".
 - If nothing significant changed, return 1 bullet: "Steady state — no major shifts in the leaderboard or metrics."
 - Keep each bullet under 20 words. No fluff.
 - sentiment: "positive" for improvements, "warning" for regressions, "neutral" for informational.
@@ -132,7 +133,7 @@ LATEST REPORT (${latest.created_at}):
 
 Top movers: ${movers.map(m => `@${m.login}: rank ${m.rankA}→${m.rankB}, impact ${m.impactDelta > 0 ? '+' : ''}${m.impactDelta.toFixed(1)}`).join(', ')}
 ${newDevs.length > 0 ? `New developers: ${newDevs.map(l => '@' + l).join(', ')}` : ''}
-${departedDevs.length > 0 ? `Departed developers: ${departedDevs.map(l => '@' + l).join(', ')}` : ''}`;
+${inactiveDevs.length > 0 ? `Recently inactive (no commits in latest report): ${inactiveDevs.map(l => '@' + l).join(', ')}` : ''}`;
 
   try {
     const client = await getLLMClient();