Skip to content

Router False Positives #817

@0xvanbeethoven

Description

@0xvanbeethoven

Type of MEV

atomic-arbitrage

Etherscan Links to Transactions

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x0fc42e1d7fc05c2ad9854c29bf0a338e2540d64fa09330f6870c9378c90a2899

Protocols Interacted With in the Bundle

  • 1 inch
  • Dodo

Were all protocols correctly supported?

  • Yes, all protocols were correctly supported.
  • No, there were issues with protocol support.

Details of Misclassification

  • Falsely classified as atomic arbitrage

Expected Correct Classification (Optional)

  • Not an arbitrage

Additional Context (Optional)

No response

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow the Code of Conduct.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    S-needs-triageThis issue needs to be labelledmev-false-positiveTransactions that Brontes incorrectly classified as Mev

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions