Skip to content

BETA-098 :: Run a structured beta usability and accessibility acceptance session #2005

Description

@kryputh

BETA-098/100 · Workflow 4 — Security, Operations & Beta Launch

Goal

Automated tests cannot prove that new users understand identity, postage, requests, proofs, and recovery.

Who performs this and what they must achieve

As a product team, we want representative first-time users to attempt every critical journey on phone and desktop so comprehension, accessibility and release-blocking failures are found before launch.

Work to complete

  • Test representative first-time users on signup, onboarding, address sharing, sending, requests, proof inspection, recovery, and feedback across mobile and desktop.
  • Measure completion, errors, confusion, time, accessibility barriers, and support requests against explicit targets.
  • Convert only release-blocking findings into the final triage gate; preserve evidence and owner.

Complete the operational or security loop, not only a document, dashboard or workflow file. Where this issue intentionally produces documentation, it must be exercised against the real beta path and include captured evidence.

Primary code and operational areas

  • docs/product/beta-acceptance/
  • tests/e2e/
  • src/features/feedback/

Use least privilege, redacted evidence and repeatable commands. Any external provider-console step must also have a repository-side checklist or verification command; never place credentials in the issue or PR.

Release acceptance scenarios

  • Sessions use test data and informed diagnostic consent.
  • Critical comprehension or accessibility failures block launch.
  • Findings are prioritized by user impact and linked to reproducible evidence.

Evidence required

  • Execute the stated operator, security-tester or beta-user journey against a production-like environment.
  • Include automated tests or repeatable scripts for every control that can be tested automatically.
  • Record exact versions, configuration/manifest identifiers and redacted results.
  • Show one successful path and the material failure, denial, recovery or rollback paths.
  • Link every discovered blocker to an owner and reproducible proof; do not silently accept a failed gate.
  • Run the relevant CI and release checks and include exact commands/results in the PR.
  • Confirm that no plaintext message, token, password, seed, private key or production credential appears in artifacts.

Dependencies

Do not sign off this issue while a dependency or required release gate is incomplete.

Definition of done

The named actor can execute the stated procedure on the real beta stack; acceptance scenarios have verifiable evidence and ownership; failure and rollback behavior are proven where relevant; no critical unresolved defect remains within this scope; and required CI/release gates pass.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

AccessibilityAccessibility workCampaignCampaign-scoped demo admin dashboard workGrantFox OSSGrantFox open-source contribution issueMaybe RewardedPotentially rewardable contributor issueOfficial CampaignOfficial campaign issueTestingTesting workThird CampaignCampaign: Third CampaigndocumentationDocumentation workhelp wantedExtra attention is needed

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions