当前提示词中定义的大模型调用工具的 XML 标签格式为 <func_call> 内嵌套 <func_name>，再跟随 <param>。计划将其改为 <func_call name="..."> 内直接包含 <param> 标签，统一标签格式，降低模型幻觉风险。
Currently, the XML tag format for LLM tool calls is defined as <func_call> wrapping <func_name>, followed by <param>. The plan is to change it to <func_call name="..."> directly containing <param> tags, unifying the tag format to reduce model hallucination risks.
旧格式示例 / Old format example:
<func_call>
<func_name>get_weather</func_name>
<param name="city">Beijing</param>
</func_call>新格式示例 / New format example:
<func_call name="get_weather">
<param name="city">Beijing</param>
</func_call>该变更尚未开始实施。
This change has not yet been implemented.
主要理由：将函数名从独立标签移入属性，能减少标签嵌套冗余与歧义，使格式更接近常见 JSON 或属性式函数调用模式，从而降低模型生成错误闭合或额外占位内容的风险。
Main rationale: Moving the function name from a separate tag into an attribute reduces nesting redundancy and ambiguity, making the format closer to common JSON or attribute-based function calling patterns, thereby lowering the risk of the model generating incorrect closures or extra placeholder content.
当前提示词中定义的大模型调用工具的 XML 标签格式为
<func_call>内嵌套<func_name>，再跟随<param>。计划将其改为<func_call name="...">内直接包含<param>标签，统一标签格式，降低模型幻觉风险。Currently, the XML tag format for LLM tool calls is defined as
<func_call>wrapping<func_name>, followed by<param>. The plan is to change it to<func_call name="...">directly containing<param>tags, unifying the tag format to reduce model hallucination risks.旧格式示例 / Old format example:
新格式示例 / New format example:
该变更尚未开始实施。
This change has not yet been implemented.
主要理由：将函数名从独立标签移入属性，能减少标签嵌套冗余与歧义，使格式更接近常见 JSON 或属性式函数调用模式，从而降低模型生成错误闭合或额外占位内容的风险。
Main rationale: Moving the function name from a separate tag into an attribute reduces nesting redundancy and ambiguity, making the format closer to common JSON or attribute-based function calling patterns, thereby lowering the risk of the model generating incorrect closures or extra placeholder content.