I dont understand how the second and fourth row are calculated. What are the exact values of the terms here?
all rows are calculated the same way. They show the expected costs associated with 4 different alternatives that can be chosen. You can see how the calculations are carried out by looking at the decision tree that is in the first toggle on the page with this exercise https://tudelft-citg.github.io/MUDE/exercises/exercise-paint.html
For the High-Quality Sanding variant: I did the following: 40 + 5 + 0.02 (500 + 40 + 5) = 55.9 But according to the table it should be 61. What am I doing wrong?
I have the same, and similarly when calculating it for /10y I get for the hight quality and sanding = 40 + 5 + 0.18(40+5+500) = 143.1 instead of 150.6 :(
Hmm it looks like it’s a typo. Sorry about that—-I am surprised it hasn’t been found till now! The values with sanding appear to be wrong: instead of 61.0 and 83.0 they should be 55.9 and 77.5
I dont understand how the second and fourth row are calculated. What are the exact values of the terms here?
all rows are calculated the same way. They show the expected costs associated with 4 different alternatives that can be chosen. You can see how the calculations are carried out by looking at the decision tree that is in the first toggle on the page with this exercise https://tudelft-citg.github.io/MUDE/exercises/exercise-paint.html
For the High-Quality Sanding variant: I did the following: 40 + 5 + 0.02 (500 + 40 + 5) = 55.9 But according to the table it should be 61. What am I doing wrong?
I have the same, and similarly when calculating it for /10y I get for the hight quality and sanding = 40 + 5 + 0.18(40+5+500) = 143.1 instead of 150.6 :(
Hmm it looks like it’s a typo. Sorry about that—-I am surprised it hasn’t been found till now! The values with sanding appear to be wrong: instead of 61.0 and 83.0 they should be 55.9 and 77.5