A new major Android Gradle Plugin release is available.
|
|
| Currently pinned |
8.10.1 |
| Newest stable |
9.4.0 |
| Newest stable on the pinned major |
8.13.2 |
| Pinned in |
android/settings.gradle |
| Source |
https://dl.google.com/dl/android/maven2/com/android/tools/build/gradle/maven-metadata.xml |
No PR was opened, on purpose
android/settings.gradle has not been changed and no commit was made. Patch and
minor updates within the pinned major get an automatic draft PR; a major
does not, because a major upgrade is not a one-line pin change (#362).
The two are tracked separately: if the newest release on the pinned major
is ahead of what is pinned, that update still gets its own ordinary draft
PR this week. A new major never blocks it.
Read this one carefully
Linthra's F-Droid release still builds its per-ABI versionCodes by
iterating applicationVariants in android/app/build.gradle. That is
legacy Android DSL behaviour, and the next AGP major removes the API it
depends on. Bumping this pin without first porting that logic does not
produce a build failure so much as a wrong versionCode scheme —
which is the one thing an F-Droid release cannot get wrong, because
published version codes can never be reused or walked back.
Treat the variant/versionCode port as the actual work item here. The
version bump is the easy part.
Why this stays manual
- Flutter compatibility. Flutter ships its own Gradle plugin and
supports a bounded range of build tooling. The SDK pinned in
.flutter-version decides what this project may actually use, and
"newer" is not the same as "supported".
- The Android build itself. A major here changes defaults, removes
deprecated DSL and can alter what ends up in the APK. That is a review,
not a version bump.
- F-Droid and reproducibility. The F-Droid builder resolves this
toolchain offline from the files in this repository. A major upgrade can
change what the builder must provide and whether the build still
reproduces, and CI cannot prove either. See
docs/fdroid-build-recipe.md and the reproducibility notes.
- The rest of the toolchain. Gradle, AGP, Kotlin and the JDK move as a
compatible set; one of them crossing a major usually drags the others.
Suggested route
Do the upgrade in a normal human PR: check Flutter's supported range
first, bump the pin, port whatever the major removed, re-check the
F-Droid recipe and reproducibility notes, and let normal CI judge it.
Filed by android-toolchain-updates.yml
for issue #362. This issue is updated in place on later runs rather than
refiled, so the weekly check will not spam duplicates.
A new major Android Gradle Plugin release is available.
8.10.19.4.08.13.2android/settings.gradlehttps://dl.google.com/dl/android/maven2/com/android/tools/build/gradle/maven-metadata.xmlNo PR was opened, on purpose
android/settings.gradlehas not been changed and no commit was made. Patch andminor updates within the pinned major get an automatic draft PR; a major
does not, because a major upgrade is not a one-line pin change (#362).
The two are tracked separately: if the newest release on the pinned major
is ahead of what is pinned, that update still gets its own ordinary draft
PR this week. A new major never blocks it.
Read this one carefully
Linthra's F-Droid release still builds its per-ABI
versionCodes byiterating
applicationVariantsinandroid/app/build.gradle. That islegacy Android DSL behaviour, and the next AGP major removes the API it
depends on. Bumping this pin without first porting that logic does not
produce a build failure so much as a wrong
versionCodescheme —which is the one thing an F-Droid release cannot get wrong, because
published version codes can never be reused or walked back.
Treat the variant/versionCode port as the actual work item here. The
version bump is the easy part.
Why this stays manual
supports a bounded range of build tooling. The SDK pinned in
.flutter-versiondecides what this project may actually use, and"newer" is not the same as "supported".
deprecated DSL and can alter what ends up in the APK. That is a review,
not a version bump.
toolchain offline from the files in this repository. A major upgrade can
change what the builder must provide and whether the build still
reproduces, and CI cannot prove either. See
docs/fdroid-build-recipe.mdand the reproducibility notes.compatible set; one of them crossing a major usually drags the others.
Suggested route
Do the upgrade in a normal human PR: check Flutter's supported range
first, bump the pin, port whatever the major removed, re-check the
F-Droid recipe and reproducibility notes, and let normal CI judge it.
Filed by
android-toolchain-updates.ymlfor issue #362. This issue is updated in place on later runs rather than
refiled, so the weekly check will not spam duplicates.