License Field Missing DXC's License

[cwfitzgerald]

Thanks for this amazing library! As we're integrating this in wgpu, I noticed that the license is listed as only MIT.

Because this links in DXC the license field should probably be MIT AND NCSA.

[MarijnS95]

It only dynamically links (or rather, dlopens) the DXC library - and we don't ship that DXC library either - so I'm not sure if the same licensing rules for e.g. statically linked libraries (when distributed) hold.

[cwfitzgerald]

Hmm, that's fair - I just worry about automated tooling not catching the NCSA license when analyzing the tree (as most cases people using this library will want to load DXC).

If only there was a MIT (AND MAYBE NCSA) :)

[MarijnS95]

I'll discuss this inside Traverse as well, since... IANAL :)

[MarijnS95]

OTOH such automated tooling should consider Rust crate dependencies, and separately any other resources that a user/company may (have to) ship as part of their release?