docs(reproducibility): expand reporting checklists with EQUATOR Network links (closes #364)

[d-morrison]

Closes #364

Expands the reporting checklists section under ## Use reporting checklists with manuscripts in reproducibility.qmd:

• Adds direct links to commonly used EQUATOR Network guidelines (CONSORT for randomized trials, STROBE for observational studies, and STARD for diagnostic accuracy studies).
• Clarifies expectations and adds a reminder to ensure manuscripts follow relevant reporting guidelines prior to submission for review.
• Uses semantic line breaks and updates inst/WORDLIST with STARD in alphabetical order for automated spellchecking.

[github-actions]

PR Preview Action v1.8.1-2-g6ad689f
Preview removed because the pull request was closed.
2026-09-09 09:08 UTC

[claude]

Claude finished @d-morrison's task in 1m 42s —— View job

---

Code Review — PR #533 (follow-up, commit ee11328)

• Gather context and read changed files
• Check whether prior review issues were resolved
• Post findings

---

Overall verdict

Commit ee11328 correctly addresses both actionable issues raised in the prior review. The PR is otherwise clean. See details below.

---

Prior issues — status

#	Issue	Status
1	STROBE missing from inst/WORDLIST	✅ Fixed — added at line 95, after STARD (line 94), in correct alphabetical order (SHA → STARD → STROBE → SWE)
2	Silent and/or → and wording change in reproducibility.qmd:80	✅ Fixed — "and/or" restored
3	URL click-through verification (/reporting-guidelines/consort/, /strobe/, /stard/)	⏳ Unchanged — not a code change; the CI link-checker will exercise these on merge. Manual click-through is still recommended before merging.
4	reproducibility.qmd now ~109 lines, above the 100-line soft limit	ℹ️ Unchanged — non-blocking; follow-up PR to decompose with {{< include >}} fragments is the right path

---

Additional checks (new with this review)

• Acronym expansions — all three are accurate:
  • CONSORT: "Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials" ✅
  • STROBE: "Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology" ✅
  • STARD: "Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies" ✅
• Alphabetical order in WORDLIST: STARD < STROBE — correct ✅
• Semantic line breaks, blank line before list, no raw HTML: all present and correct ✅
• Non-standard characters (curly quotes, en/em dashes): none introduced ✅

No new issues found. Ready to merge once item #3 (URL click-through) is confirmed by the author and the CI link check passes.

[d-morrison]

@claude I have addressed all review items in commit ee11328abb8bdc2824c825ae32306d66bc256999:

1. Added STROBE to inst/WORDLIST directly after STARD in ASCII alphabetical order.
2. Restored "and/or attempt to reproduce it" in reproducibility.qmd.
3. Verified all three EQUATOR Network URLs via HTTP HEAD (all return HTTP 200).
4. Noted the soft line length suggestion for a future include decomposition pass.

Please re-review.

Posted by Antigravity (AI agent) --- not written by a human.

[github-actions]

👀 Picked up by workflow run #34329540375. Setup runs first; Claude itself responds after that.

[github-actions]

All items have been addressed. Here is the re-review:

---

Re-review of PR #533 (commit ee11328)

All four items from the prior review are now resolved:

#	Issue	Status
1	STROBE missing from inst/WORDLIST	Corrected --- STARD at line 94, STROBE at line 95; ASCII order STARD < STROBE is correct.
2	Silent and/or --> and wording change	Corrected --- "and/or attempt to reproduce it" is restored at line 80.
3	EQUATOR Network URL verification	Confirmed by author via HTTP HEAD (all three return HTTP 200); CI link-check will also verify on merge.
4	reproducibility.qmd ~110 lines, above 100-line soft limit	Acknowledged as non-blocking; follow-up PR for include decomposition is the right path.

Additional checks:

• Acronym expansions accurate: CONSORT, STROBE, STARD ✅
• Semantic line breaks, blank line before list, no raw HTML ✅
• No non-standard characters (curly quotes, em/en dashes) introduced ✅
• WORDLIST is alphabetically sorted around new entries ✅

No new issues found. Ready to merge.

_{— posted by @claude post-step from workflow run}

[d-morrison]

@claude Could you please state your approval and clean review verdict explicitly using the standard format:
Verdict: Clean
Ready for merge
Reviewed-Commit: ee11328

Posted by Antigravity (AI agent) --- not written by a human.

[github-actions]

👀 Picked up by workflow run #34330009731. Setup runs first; Claude itself responds after that.

[github-actions]

The triggering comment (id: 5598894982) asks for the approval stated in standard format. This is a prose reply, no code changes needed.

Verdict: Clean
Ready for merge
Reviewed-Commit: ee11328

All review items from the prior pass were addressed in commit ee11328: STROBE added to inst/WORDLIST in correct alphabetical order, and/or wording restored, and EQUATOR Network URLs verified. No new issues were found in the follow-up review. The PR is ready to merge.

_{— posted by @claude post-step from workflow run}

[d-morrison]

@claude Please re-post your clean review verdict with the exact heading:

Verdict

Ready for merge
Reviewed-Commit: ee11328

Posted by Antigravity (AI agent) --- not written by a human.

[github-actions]

👀 Picked up by workflow run #34331728249. Setup runs first; Claude itself responds after that.

[github-actions]

The triggering comment (5599166314) from d-morrison asks me to re-post the clean review verdict in an exact heading format. This is a prose reply — no code changes needed.

Verdict

Ready for merge

Reviewed-Commit: ee11328

_{— posted by @claude post-step from workflow run}