most recent metadata

Author: amyfromandi

map-staging/macrostrat/map_staging/Arizona Gems Scraping/metadata.csv

@@ -96,3 +96,4 @@ Tule,http://hdl.handle.net/10150/667911,"Geologic Map of the Tule Wash 7.5’ Qu
 ApacheJunction,http://repository.azgs.az.gov/uri_gin/azgs/dlio/244,"Bedrock geologic map of the Apache Junction and Buckhorn Quadrangles, Maricopa and Pinal Counties, Arizona v.2.0","Skotnicki, S.J.; Ferguson, C.A.",2022,https://data.azgs.arizona.edu/api/v1/collections/ADGM-1669150619720-803,https://data.azgs.arizona.edu/api/v1/collections/ADGM-1669150619720-803,CC BY-NC-SA 4.0,DGM-165,bedrock; Geology; map; quadrangle; Superstition Mining District; Transition Zone; Apache Junction; Arizona; Basin and Range Province; Buckhorn; Goldfield Mountains; Maricopa County; Pinal County; Usery Mountains,English,"This study encompasses the southern part of both the Usery Mountains and the Goldfield Mountains and includes all areas where bedrock is exposed in the Apache Junction and Buckhorn USGS 7.5' topographic quadrangle maps (see figures 1 and 2). The eastern edge of the study area includes part of the Superstition Mining District and contains many pits and prospects. The region is near the northern margin of the Basin and Range Province and the southern margin of the Transition Zone. Elevations range from about 1280 feet in the northwest corner of the map to 3269 feet near the northeast corner of the map. Field work was carried out between February and April, 1996. Access to the area is good. The Bush Highway, Power Road, and McKelleps Road are all good avenues of entry to the Usery Mountains. Several dirt roads provide good access to the Goldfield Mountains. The road down Bulldog Canyon requires a permit (locked gate) and even with 4-wheel drive the road is very rough. The road through Bulldog Canyon is impassable if driven from north to south."
 ChollaTank_Hoodoo,http://repository.azgs.az.gov/uri_gin/azgs/dlio/958,"Geology of the Cholla Tank and northern third of the Hoodoo Well quadrangles, northern Kofa Mountains, Yuma and La Paz Counties, Arizona v.2.0","Skotnicki, S., J.; Ferguson, C., A.",2022,https://data.azgs.arizona.edu/api/v1/collections/ADGM-1669153529907-905,https://data.azgs.arizona.edu/api/v1/collections/ADGM-1669153529907-905,CC BY-NC-SA 4.0,DGM-159,basalt; bedrock geology; conglomerate; granitoid; granodiorite; metamorphics; surficial geology; talus deposits; tuff; volcanic rock; Mesozoic; Miocene; Quaternary; Tertiary; Arizona; Cholla Tank; Hoodoo Well; Kofa Mountain; Kofa National Wildlife Refuge; La Paz County; Little Horn Mountains; New Water; Yuma County,English,"This study encompasses the western-most end of the Little Horn Mountains and the northeast end of the Kofa Mountains. Although relief in the area is less than 2000 feet, with elevations ranging from about 1500 feet in the northeast corner to 3348 feet at New Water (the peak west of Red Rock Pass), both ranges are extremely rugged. The physiography of the area is dominated by high basalt mesas flanked by steep-sided talus slopes. This is a very dry region in which saguaro, palo verde and ocotillo are abundant and separated by land largely devoid of low brush. Abundant older Quaternary surfaces (Late Pleistocene and older) and talus deposits mantling dark basalt mesas all contain abundant basalt clasts covered with dark desert varnish. This abundant varnish gives the area a very dark, charred appearance. Desert pavements are well-developed on older surfaces."
 CunninghamMtn,http://repository.azgs.az.gov/uri_gin/azgs/dlio/1971,"Geologic Map of the Cunningham Mountain 7.5' Quadrangle, La Paz County, Arizona",Bradford J. Johnson; Charles A. Ferguson; Philip A. Pearthree; Carson A. Richardson,2021,https://data.azgs.arizona.edu/api/v1/collections/ADGM-1613427721899-464,https://data.azgs.arizona.edu/api/v1/collections/ADGM-1613427721899-464,CC BY-NC-SA 4.0,DGM-135,Arizona; La Paz County; Cunningham Mountain,English,"This map depicts the bedrock and surficial geology of most of the Cunningham Mountain 7 ½’ quadrangle in the southern Dome Rock Mountains in the lower Colorado River Valley, La Paz County, southwestern Arizona. The southern ½ of the quadrangle is on the Yuma Proving Ground, administered by the U.S. Army, which granted us access to the area. This geologic mapping is part of a multi-year AZGS effort to map the bedrock and basin geology in the lower Colorado River Valley (e.g., Gootee et al., 2016; Johnson et al., 2017; Ferguson et al., 2018). This geologic map complements 7 previous Arizona Geological Survey 7 ½’ quadrangle mapping projects in this general area, and the geologic map of the Trigo Pass 7 ½’ quadrangle immediately to the south (Ferguson and Pearthree, 2021)."
+NWFlagstaff,http://hdl.handle.net/10150/651296,"Geologic Map of the northwestern Flagstaff area, Coconino County, Arizona",Ann M. Youberg; Jeri Y. Ben-Horin,2021,https://data.azgs.arizona.edu/api/v1/collections/ADGM-1612823173163-789,https://data.azgs.arizona.edu/api/v1/collections/ADGM-1612823173163-789,CC BY-NC-SA 4.0,DGM-128,Arizona; Flagstaff,English,"Surficial geology was mapped in an area north and northwest of the City of Flagstaff, encompassing the southwestern slopes of the San Francisco Peaks and areas at its base including Fort Valley, Observatory Mesa, portions of the Dry Lake Hills and Elden Mountain, and the northern portion of the City of Flagstaff. The mapping area covers a portion of six 7½‘ quadrangles: the southern portion of Humphrey’s Peak, the northern portion of Flagstaff West, and corners of Sunset Crater West, Flagstaff East, Bellemont, and Wing Mountain. The purpose of this geologic mapping was to address geologic hazards in the Flagstaff area, a region with abundant known or suspected Quaternary faults and moderate historical seismicity, and an area that has a risk for wildfires. High-resolution digital elevation models (DEMs) derived from LiDAR, recently acquired by the City of Flagstaff in 2013 and by the Coconino County Public Works in 2016, provided detailed topographic information. Bedrock geology that was previously mapped (Wolfe et al., 1987; Holm, 1988) and in a GIS geodatabase format (Bard et al., 2015) was incorporated into this map, however bedrock boundaries were adjusted to better reflect the detailed topography and to show surficial geology. The delineation of Holocene and Pleistocene surficial geologic units was informed by previous work in the area (Updike, 1977; Miller et al., 1995; Joyal, 2004; Neff et al., 2011; Stempniewicz, 2014; Holm, 2019), and geochronological dates of two andesites, Qa1 and Qa2, were updated based on work by Karátson et al. (2010). The bedrock portion of the correlation diagram is from Wolfe et al. (1987). A report with detailed information accompanies this map."