release: 1.3.6 #489
Workflow file for this run
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| name: Claude Code Review | |
| on: | |
| pull_request: | |
| types: [opened, synchronize, ready_for_review, reopened] | |
| # Optional: Only run on specific file changes | |
| # paths: | |
| # - "src/**/*.ts" | |
| # - "src/**/*.tsx" | |
| # - "src/**/*.js" | |
| # - "src/**/*.jsx" | |
| jobs: | |
| claude-review: | |
| # Opt-out: PR authors can apply the `skip-claude-review` label to suppress | |
| # the bot on subsequent commits. Removing the label re-enables review on | |
| # the next push. | |
| if: ${{ !contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'skip-claude-review') }} | |
| # Optional: Filter by PR author | |
| # if: | | |
| # github.event.pull_request.user.login == 'external-contributor' || | |
| # github.event.pull_request.user.login == 'new-developer' || | |
| # github.event.pull_request.author_association == 'FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR' | |
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | |
| permissions: | |
| contents: read | |
| pull-requests: write | |
| issues: write | |
| id-token: write | |
| steps: | |
| - name: Checkout repository | |
| uses: actions/checkout@34e114876b0b11c390a56381ad16ebd13914f8d5 # v4 | |
| with: | |
| fetch-depth: 1 | |
| - name: Run Claude Code Review | |
| id: claude-review | |
| uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@26ddc358fe3befff50c5ec2f80304c90c763f6f8 # v1 | |
| with: | |
| claude_code_oauth_token: ${{ secrets.CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN }} | |
| plugin_marketplaces: 'https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code.git' | |
| plugins: 'code-review@claude-code-plugins' | |
| prompt: | | |
| You are reviewing PR #${{ github.event.pull_request.number }} in ${{ github.repository }}. | |
| STEP 1 — Fetch existing review threads and issue comments BEFORE reviewing. | |
| Run this GraphQL query and read the results carefully: | |
| gh api graphql -f query=' | |
| query($owner:String!,$repo:String!,$num:Int!){ | |
| repository(owner:$owner,name:$repo){ | |
| pullRequest(number:$num){ | |
| reviewThreads(first:100){ | |
| nodes{ | |
| id | |
| isResolved | |
| path | |
| line | |
| comments(first:20){ nodes{ author{login} body }} | |
| } | |
| } | |
| comments(first:100){ | |
| nodes{ author{login} body } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }' \ | |
| -f owner=${{ github.repository_owner }} \ | |
| -f repo=${{ github.event.repository.name }} \ | |
| -F num=${{ github.event.pull_request.number }} | |
| STEP 2 — Build a set of issues already covered by prior bot comments | |
| (threads whose first comment is authored by a bot or this workflow's | |
| identity). Treat each prior comment as "(path, line, topic)". | |
| STEP 3 — Dedupe policy. For each issue you are about to raise, look for a | |
| prior thread covering the same (path, line, topic): | |
| • If an UNRESOLVED thread exists for this (path, line, topic) → SKIP. | |
| Don't duplicate an open thread; the user will get to it. | |
| • If a RESOLVED thread exists for this (path, line, topic), classify the | |
| ORIGINAL comment: | |
| (a) Actionable ask (it requested the author to change something — | |
| e.g. "rename X", "use Y instead", "extract this", "add null check"): | |
| → Read the CURRENT code at that location. | |
| - If the requested change WAS made → SKIP (user fixed it). | |
| - If the requested change was NOT made → UNRESOLVE the | |
| original thread (do NOT post a new comment). Use: | |
| gh api graphql -f query=' | |
| mutation($id:ID!){ | |
| unresolveReviewThread(input:{threadId:$id}){ | |
| thread{ id isResolved } | |
| } | |
| }' -f id=<THREAD_ID> | |
| where <THREAD_ID> is the thread.id from STEP 1. | |
| → If thread replies show the author/maintainer explicitly | |
| disagreed or declined ("won't fix", "intentional", "ship it | |
| anyway") → SKIP regardless of code state. The decision was made. | |
| (b) Informational / nit / praise / question (not an ask for a change): | |
| → SKIP. Resolution means acknowledged; don't re-post and don't | |
| unresolve. | |
| • If a prior comment raised a DIFFERENT topic on the same line → OK to post. | |
| • New issues the prior review missed entirely → post normally. | |
| STEP 4 — Read CLAUDE.md at the repo root first — it references Agents.md | |
| and agent_docs/ which contain all project conventions, architecture, and | |
| rules. Follow every convention defined there during your review. | |
| STEP 5 — Run the review. The /code-review plugin below will analyze the PR | |
| and propose inline comments. You MUST apply STEP 3 as a POSTING GATE on | |
| every single comment the plugin wants to create — this includes comments | |
| the plugin would post via mcp__github_inline_comment__create_inline_comment | |
| or via `gh pr comment`. Concretely: | |
| BEFORE every call to mcp__github_inline_comment__create_inline_comment: | |
| 1. Compute (path, line, topic) of the comment you are about to post. | |
| 2. Look it up in the dedupe set from STEP 1. | |
| 3. Apply STEP 3. If STEP 3 says SKIP → do NOT call the tool at all. | |
| If STEP 3 says UNRESOLVE → call the unresolveReviewThread mutation | |
| INSTEAD of posting a new comment. | |
| 4. Only post if STEP 3 says OK to post. | |
| Top-level summary comment — POST ONLY IF the run produced an action. | |
| An action means: (a) you posted at least one new inline comment, OR | |
| (b) you unresolved at least one previously-resolved thread. If neither | |
| happened, post NO summary comment at all — stay completely silent. | |
| Do NOT post filler summaries like "No new issues" or "Nothing to report". | |
| When you DO post a summary, list only: (a) the new findings you posted | |
| this run, and (b) any threads you unresolved this run. Do not list | |
| issues you skipped via the dedupe gate. | |
| STEP 6 — Post approval message or stay silent. | |
| After the review completes: | |
| • If you posted NO new inline comments and unresolved NO threads | |
| (i.e., the PR is clean) → post an approval comment using: | |
| gh pr comment ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }} --body "✅ No issues found. Checked for bugs and CLAUDE.md compliance." | |
| • If you DID post inline comments or unresolve threads → do NOT post an approval comment. | |
| Now run the plugin: | |
| /code-review:code-review ${{ github.repository }}/pull/${{ github.event.pull_request.number }} --comment | |
| use_sticky_comment: true | |
| claude_args: | | |
| --allowedTools "mcp__github_inline_comment__create_inline_comment,Bash(gh pr comment:*),Bash(gh pr diff:*),Bash(gh pr view:*),Bash(gh pr list:*),Bash(gh api graphql:*),Bash(gh api:*)" |