Is this `sola` supposed to be an `obj`?

[AngledLuffa]

obj seems a little weird here, but I could be misreading it

# sent_id = 3LB-CAST-t5-6-s9
# text = La televisión hablaba sola en su rincón con verborrea mecánica: a Antonia le gustaba mantener el aparato encendido, lo estuviera viendo o no.
# orig_file_sentence 029#80
1       La      el      DET     da0fs0  Definite=Def|Gender=Fem|Number=Sing|PronType=Art        2       det     2:det   _
2       televisión      televisión      NOUN    ncfs000 Gender=Fem|Number=Sing  3       nsubj   3:nsubj ArgTem=arg0:agt
3       hablaba hablar  VERB    vmii3s0 Mood=Ind|Number=Sing|Person=3|Tense=Imp|VerbForm=Fin    0       root    0:root  _
4       sola    solo    ADJ     aq0fs0  Gender=Fem|Number=Sing  3       obj     3:obj   ArgTem=argM:atr
5       en      en      ADP     sps00   _       7       case    7:case  _
6       su      su      DET     dp3cs0  Number=Sing|Person=3|Poss=Yes|PronType=Prs      7       det     7:det   _
7       rincón  rincón  NOUN    ncms000 Gender=Masc|Number=Sing 3       obl     3:obl   ArgTem=argM:loc
8       con     con     ADP     sps00   _       9       case    9:case  _
9       verborrea       verborrea       NOUN    ncfs000 Gender=Fem|Number=Sing  3       obl     3:obl   ArgTem=argM:adv
10      mecánica        mecánico        ADJ     aq0fs0  Gender=Fem|Number=Sing  9       amod    9:amod  SpaceAfter=No

[AngledLuffa]

there are other cases where it has a VERB head and obj deprel, so maybe it's correct / intended. does seem weird to me, though

[dan-zeman]

I think it is a depictive and it should be advcl.

[AngledLuffa]

Agreed. I'll put together a PR

[AngledLuffa]

Here are the current instances of solo and friends as obj... not seeing ones that should be obj but there are some misparses in here as well IMO. highlight comments set up for conllueditor, if you use that...

solo.txt

[AngledLuffa]

There's also some cases of ExtPos=ADV on a solas where solas doesn't have a fixed deprel

[dan-zeman]

I don't use conllueditor, I use this :-)

cat *.conllu | udapy -TAM util.Mark node='node.lemma == "solo" and node.upos == "ADJ" and node.udeprel == "obj"' | less -R

It looks like some instances may be obligatory depictives, which would lead to xcomp instead of advcl.

[AngledLuffa]

less is excellent of course, but just to shill for the conllueditor group (individual?), it works great for visualizing the trees.

I do not know that I would do a respectable job of finding obligatory depictives (again, not fluent in Spanish)... is this a task you would feel comfortable with? Punting it off to an LLM seems kinda weak

[dan-zeman]

less is excellent of course, but just to shill for the conllueditor group (individual?), it works great for visualizing the trees.

So does udapy in my view, but I guess that's a matter of taste. I actually have used conllueditor for annotation and liked it (if I recall correctly that it was named just like this) but I don't think I could use it for quick checks in SSH terminal.

[dan-zeman]

I do not know that I would do a respectable job of finding obligatory depictives (again, not fluent in Spanish)... is this a task you would feel comfortable with?

Yes, I can do it.

[AngledLuffa]

So does udapy in my view, but I guess that's a matter of taste. I actually have used conllueditor for annotation and liked it (if I recall correctly that it was named just like this) but I don't think I could use it for quick checks in SSH terminal.

Oh, that's clever. I like it. I may try to rip that off for use in Semgrex...