Unsupervisedcom
diff --git a/‎.claude/commands/add_platform.verify.md‎
Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions b/‎.claude/commands/add_platform.verify.md‎
Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
diff --git a/‎.claude/commands/deepwork_jobs.implement.md‎
Lines changed: 25 additions & 25 deletions b/‎.claude/commands/deepwork_jobs.implement.md‎
Lines changed: 25 additions & 25 deletions
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ hooks:
             2. Running `deepwork install --platform <platform>` completes without errors
             3. Expected command files are created in the platform's command directory
             4. Command file content matches the templates and job definitions
-            5. Established DeepWork jobs (deepwork_jobs, deepwork_policy) are installed correctly
+            5. Established DeepWork jobs (deepwork_jobs, deepwork_rules) are installed correctly
             6. The platform can be used alongside existing platforms without conflicts
 
             If ALL criteria are met, include `<promise>✓ Quality Criteria Met</promise>`.
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ Ensure the implementation step is complete:
    - `deepwork_jobs.define.md` exists (or equivalent for the platform)
    - `deepwork_jobs.implement.md` exists
    - `deepwork_jobs.refine.md` exists
-   - `deepwork_policy.define.md` exists
+   - `deepwork_rules.define.md` exists
    - All expected step commands exist
 
 4. **Validate command file content**
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ Ensure the implementation step is complete:
 - `deepwork install --platform <platform_name>` completes without errors
 - All expected command files are created:
   - deepwork_jobs.define, implement, refine
-  - deepwork_policy.define
+  - deepwork_rules.define
   - Any other standard job commands
 - Command file content is correct:
   - Matches platform's expected format
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ Verify the installation meets ALL criteria:
 2. Running `deepwork install --platform <platform>` completes without errors
 3. Expected command files are created in the platform's command directory
 4. Command file content matches the templates and job definitions
-5. Established DeepWork jobs (deepwork_jobs, deepwork_policy) are installed correctly
+5. Established DeepWork jobs (deepwork_jobs, deepwork_rules) are installed correctly
 6. The platform can be used alongside existing platforms without conflicts
 
 If ALL criteria are met, include `<promise>✓ Quality Criteria Met</promise>`.
 
@@ -19,9 +19,9 @@ hooks:
             6. **Ask Structured Questions**: Do step instructions that gather user input explicitly use the phrase "ask structured questions"?
             7. **Sync Complete**: Has `deepwork sync` been run successfully?
             8. **Commands Available**: Are the slash-commands generated in `.claude/commands/`?
-            9. **Policies Considered**: Have you thought about whether policies would benefit this job?
-               - If relevant policies were identified, did you explain them and offer to run `/deepwork_policy.define`?
-               - Not every job needs policies - only suggest when genuinely helpful.
+            9. **Rules Considered**: Have you thought about whether rules would benefit this job?
+               - If relevant rules were identified, did you explain them and offer to run `/deepwork_rules.define`?
+               - Not every job needs rules - only suggest when genuinely helpful.
 
             If ANY criterion is not met, continue working to address it.
             If ALL criteria are satisfied, include `<promise>✓ Quality Criteria Met</promise>` in your response.
@@ -200,48 +200,48 @@ This will:
 
 After running `deepwork sync`, look at the "To use the new commands" section in the output. **Relay these exact reload instructions to the user** so they know how to pick up the new commands. Don't just reference the sync output - tell them directly what they need to do (e.g., "Type 'exit' then run 'claude --resume'" for Claude Code, or "Run '/memory refresh'" for Gemini CLI).
 
-### Step 7: Consider Policies for the New Job
+### Step 7: Consider Rules for the New Job
 
-After implementing the job, consider whether there are **policies** that would help enforce quality or consistency when working with this job's domain.
+After implementing the job, consider whether there are **rules** that would help enforce quality or consistency when working with this job's domain.
 
-**What are policies?**
+**What are rules?**
 
-Policies are automated guardrails defined in `.deepwork.policy.yml` that trigger when certain files change during an AI session. They help ensure:
+Rules are automated guardrails stored as markdown files in `.deepwork/rules/` that trigger when certain files change during an AI session. They help ensure:
 - Documentation stays in sync with code
 - Team guidelines are followed
 - Architectural decisions are respected
 - Quality standards are maintained
 
-**When to suggest policies:**
+**When to suggest rules:**
 
 Think about the job you just implemented and ask:
 - Does this job produce outputs that other files depend on?
 - Are there documentation files that should be updated when this job's outputs change?
 - Are there quality checks or reviews that should happen when certain files in this domain change?
 - Could changes to the job's output files impact other parts of the project?
 
-**Examples of policies that might make sense:**
+**Examples of rules that might make sense:**
 
-| Job Type | Potential Policy |
-|----------|------------------|
+| Job Type | Potential Rule |
+|----------|----------------|
 | API Design | "Update API docs when endpoint definitions change" |
 | Database Schema | "Review migrations when schema files change" |
 | Competitive Research | "Update strategy docs when competitor analysis changes" |
 | Feature Development | "Update changelog when feature files change" |
 | Configuration Management | "Update install guide when config files change" |
 
-**How to offer policy creation:**
+**How to offer rule creation:**
 
-If you identify one or more policies that would benefit the user, explain:
-1. **What the policy would do** - What triggers it and what action it prompts
+If you identify one or more rules that would benefit the user, explain:
+1. **What the rule would do** - What triggers it and what action it prompts
 2. **Why it would help** - How it prevents common mistakes or keeps things in sync
 3. **What files it would watch** - The trigger patterns
 
 Then ask the user:
 
-> "Would you like me to create this policy for you? I can run `/deepwork_policy.define` to set it up."
+> "Would you like me to create this rule for you? I can run `/deepwork_rules.define` to set it up."
 
-If the user agrees, invoke the `/deepwork_policy.define` command to guide them through creating the policy.
+If the user agrees, invoke the `/deepwork_rules.define` command to guide them through creating the rule.
 
 **Example dialogue:**
 
@@ -250,15 +250,15 @@ Based on the competitive_research job you just created, I noticed that when
 competitor analysis files change, it would be helpful to remind you to update
 your strategy documentation.
 
-I'd suggest a policy like:
+I'd suggest a rule like:
 - **Name**: "Update strategy when competitor analysis changes"
 - **Trigger**: `**/positioning_report.md`
 - **Action**: Prompt to review and update `docs/strategy.md`
 
-Would you like me to create this policy? I can run `/deepwork_policy.define` to set it up.
+Would you like me to create this rule? I can run `/deepwork_rules.define` to set it up.
 ```
 
-**Note:** Not every job needs policies. Only suggest them when they would genuinely help maintain consistency or quality. Don't force policies where they don't make sense.
+**Note:** Not every job needs rules. Only suggest them when they would genuinely help maintain consistency or quality. Don't force rules where they don't make sense.
 
 ## Example Implementation
 
@@ -292,8 +292,8 @@ Before marking this step complete, ensure:
 - [ ] `deepwork sync` executed successfully
 - [ ] Commands generated in platform directory
 - [ ] User informed to follow reload instructions from `deepwork sync`
-- [ ] Considered whether policies would benefit this job (Step 7)
-- [ ] If policies suggested, offered to run `/deepwork_policy.define`
+- [ ] Considered whether rules would benefit this job (Step 7)
+- [ ] If rules suggested, offered to run `/deepwork_rules.define`
 
 ## Quality Criteria
 
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ Before marking this step complete, ensure:
 - Steps with user inputs explicitly use "ask structured questions" phrasing
 - Sync completed successfully
 - Commands available for use
-- Thoughtfully considered relevant policies for the job domain
+- Thoughtfully considered relevant rules for the job domain
 
 
 ## Inputs
@@ -355,9 +355,9 @@ Verify the implementation meets ALL quality criteria before completing:
 6. **Ask Structured Questions**: Do step instructions that gather user input explicitly use the phrase "ask structured questions"?
 7. **Sync Complete**: Has `deepwork sync` been run successfully?
 8. **Commands Available**: Are the slash-commands generated in `.claude/commands/`?
-9. **Policies Considered**: Have you thought about whether policies would benefit this job?
-   - If relevant policies were identified, did you explain them and offer to run `/deepwork_policy.define`?
-   - Not every job needs policies - only suggest when genuinely helpful.
+9. **Rules Considered**: Have you thought about whether rules would benefit this job?
+   - If relevant rules were identified, did you explain them and offer to run `/deepwork_rules.define`?
+   - Not every job needs rules - only suggest when genuinely helpful.
 
 If ANY criterion is not met, continue working to address it.
 If ALL criteria are satisfied, include `<promise>✓ Quality Criteria Met</promise>` in your response.