You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
* ❌ Increment 1: Analyze the structure and dependencies of the cargo_will crate.
6
+
* Detailed Plan Step 1: Read the `Cargo.toml` file of the `cargo_will` crate to understand its dependencies.
7
+
* Detailed Plan Step 2: List the files in the `src` directory of the `cargo_will` crate to understand its structure.
8
+
* Detailed Plan Step 3: Read the main source file (e.g., `src/lib.rs` or `src/main.rs`) to understand the crate's entry point and overall logic.
9
+
* Verification Strategy: Ensure the commands execute successfully and the output is as expected. Manually review the output to understand the structure and dependencies.
10
+
* ⏳ Increment 2: Identify and fix any compilation errors in the cargo_will crate.
11
+
* Detailed Plan Step 1: Run `cargo build` in the `module/alias/cargo_will` directory.
12
+
* Detailed Plan Step 2: Analyze the output of `cargo build` to identify any compilation errors.
13
+
* Detailed Plan Step 3: Fix any identified compilation errors.
14
+
* Verification Strategy: Ensure `cargo build` executes successfully with no errors.
15
+
16
+
## Notes & Insights
17
+
***[5/3/2025] Stuck:** Encountered persistent issues with building the crate due to dependency resolution problems. Initiating Stuck Resolution Process.
18
+
19
+
## Hypotheses
20
+
21
+
* Hypothesis 1: The path to the `willbe` dependency is incorrect.
22
+
* Hypothesis 2: There is a version conflict between the `error_tools` dependency in `cargo_will` and `willbe`.
23
+
* Hypothesis 3: There is an issue with the workspace configuration in the root `Cargo.toml` file.
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: module/core/former/Readme.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ Where `former` significantly simplifies complex scenarios is in building collect
197
197
For scenarios where you want a direct constructor function instead of always starting with `YourType::former()`, `former` offers standalone constructors.
198
198
199
199
***Enable:** Add `#[ standalone_constructors ]` to your struct or enum definition.
200
-
***Function Name:** A function named after your type (in snake_case) will be generated (e.g., `my_struct()` for `struct MyStruct`). For enums, functions are named after variants (e.g., `my_variant()` for `enum E { MyVariant }`).
200
+
***Function Name:** A function named after your type (in `snake_case`) will be generated (e.g., `my_struct()` for `struct MyStruct`). For enums, functions are named after variants (e.g., `my_variant()` for `enum E { MyVariant }`).
201
201
***Arguments:** By default, the constructor takes no arguments and returns the `Former` type.
202
202
***Specify Arguments:** Mark specific fields with `#[ arg_for_constructor ]` to make them required arguments for the standalone constructor.
0 commit comments