|
9 | 9 | * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); |
10 | 10 | * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. |
11 | 11 | * You may obtain a copy of the License at |
12 | | - * |
| 12 | + * |
13 | 13 | * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 |
14 | | - * |
| 14 | + * |
15 | 15 | * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software |
16 | 16 | * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, |
17 | 17 | * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. |
|
21 | 21 | */ |
22 | 22 |
|
23 | 23 | import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonCreator; |
| 24 | +import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonIgnore; |
24 | 25 | import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonProperty; |
25 | 26 | import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonValue; |
26 | 27 | import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.annotation.JsonDeserialize; |
|
29 | 30 | import com.google.common.primitives.UnsignedInteger; |
30 | 31 | import org.immutables.value.Value; |
31 | 32 | import org.xrpl.xrpl4j.model.flags.AccountSetTransactionFlags; |
32 | | -import org.xrpl.xrpl4j.model.flags.TransactionFlags; |
33 | 33 |
|
34 | 34 | import java.util.Optional; |
35 | 35 |
|
@@ -65,25 +65,189 @@ default AccountSetTransactionFlags flags() { |
65 | 65 | /** |
66 | 66 | * Unique identifier of a flag to disable for this account. |
67 | 67 | * |
| 68 | + * <p>If this field is empty, developers should check if {@link #clearFlagRawValue()} is also empty. If |
| 69 | + * {@link #clearFlagRawValue()} is present, it means that the {@code ClearFlag} field of the transaction was not a |
| 70 | + * valid {@link AccountSetFlag} but was still present in a validated transaction on ledger.</p> |
| 71 | + * |
68 | 72 | * <p>Because the preferred way of setting account flags is with {@link AccountSetFlag}s, this field should |
69 | 73 | * not be set in conjunction with the {@link AccountSet#flags()} field. |
70 | 74 | * |
71 | 75 | * @return An {@link Optional} of type {@link AccountSetFlag} representing the flag to disable on this account. |
72 | 76 | */ |
73 | | - @JsonProperty("ClearFlag") |
| 77 | + @JsonIgnore |
74 | 78 | Optional<AccountSetFlag> clearFlag(); |
75 | 79 |
|
| 80 | + /** |
| 81 | + * A flag to disable for this account, as an {@link UnsignedInteger}. |
| 82 | + * |
| 83 | + * <p>Developers should prefer setting {@link #clearFlag()} and leaving this field empty when constructing |
| 84 | + * a new {@link AccountSet}. This field is used to serialize and deserialize the {@code "ClearFlag"} field in JSON, |
| 85 | + * as some {@link AccountSet} transactions on the XRPL set the "ClearFlag" field to a number that is not recognized as |
| 86 | + * an asf flag by rippled. Without this field, xrpl4j would fail to deserialize those transactions, as |
| 87 | + * {@link AccountSetFlag} does not support arbitrary integer values.</p> |
| 88 | + * |
| 89 | + * <p>Additionally, using this field as the source of truth for JSON serialization/deserialization rather than |
| 90 | + * {@link #clearFlag()} allows developers to recompute the hash of a transaction that was deserialized from a rippled |
| 91 | + * RPC/WS result accurately. An alternative to this field would be to add an enum variant to {@link AccountSetFlag} |
| 92 | + * for unknown values, but binary serializing an {@link AccountSet} that was constructed by deserializing JSON would |
| 93 | + * result in a different binary blob than what exists on ledger.</p> |
| 94 | + * |
| 95 | + * @return An {@link Optional} {@link UnsignedInteger}. |
| 96 | + */ |
| 97 | + @JsonProperty("ClearFlag") |
| 98 | + Optional<UnsignedInteger> clearFlagRawValue(); |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | + /** |
| 101 | + * Normalization method to try to get {@link #clearFlag()}and {@link #clearFlagRawValue()} to match. |
| 102 | + * |
| 103 | + * <p>If neither field is present, there is nothing to do.</p> |
| 104 | + * <p>If both fields are present, there is nothing to do, but we will check that {@link #clearFlag()}'s |
| 105 | + * underlying value equals {@link #clearFlagRawValue()}.</p> |
| 106 | + * <p>If {@link #clearFlag()} is present but {@link #clearFlagRawValue()} is empty, we set |
| 107 | + * {@link #clearFlagRawValue()} to the underlying value of {@link #clearFlag()}.</p> |
| 108 | + * <p>If {@link #clearFlag()} is empty and {@link #clearFlagRawValue()} is present, we will set |
| 109 | + * {@link #clearFlag()} to the {@link AccountSetFlag} variant associated with {@link #clearFlagRawValue()}, or leave |
| 110 | + * {@link #clearFlag()} empty if {@link #clearFlagRawValue()} does not map to an {@link AccountSetFlag}.</p> |
| 111 | + * |
| 112 | + * @return A normalized {@link AccountSet}. |
| 113 | + */ |
| 114 | + @Value.Check |
| 115 | + default AccountSet normalizeClearFlag() { |
| 116 | + if (!clearFlag().isPresent() && !clearFlagRawValue().isPresent()) { |
| 117 | + // If both are empty, nothing to do. |
| 118 | + return this; |
| 119 | + } else if (clearFlag().isPresent() && clearFlagRawValue().isPresent()) { |
| 120 | + // Both will be present if: |
| 121 | + // 1. A developer set them both manually (in the builder) |
| 122 | + // 2. This normalize method has already been called. |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | + // We should still check that the clearFlagRawValue matches the inner value of AccountSetFlag. |
| 125 | + Preconditions.checkState( |
| 126 | + clearFlag().get().getValue() == clearFlagRawValue().get().longValue(), |
| 127 | + String.format("clearFlag and clearFlagRawValue should be equivalent, but clearFlag's underlying " + |
| 128 | + "value was %s and clearFlagRawValue was %s", |
| 129 | + clearFlag().get().getValue(), |
| 130 | + clearFlagRawValue().get().longValue() |
| 131 | + ) |
| 132 | + ); |
| 133 | + return this; |
| 134 | + } else if (clearFlag().isPresent() && !clearFlagRawValue().isPresent()) { |
| 135 | + // This can only happen if the developer only set clearFlag(). In this case, we need to set clearFlagRawValue to |
| 136 | + // match clearFlag. |
| 137 | + return AccountSet.builder().from(this) |
| 138 | + .clearFlagRawValue(UnsignedInteger.valueOf(clearFlag().get().getValue())) |
| 139 | + .build(); |
| 140 | + } else { // clearFlag not present and clearFlagRawValue is present |
| 141 | + // This can happen if: |
| 142 | + // 1. A developer sets clearFlagRawValue manually in the builder |
| 143 | + // 2. JSON has ClearFlag and jackson sets clearFlagRawValue. |
| 144 | + // This value will never be negative due to XRPL representing this kind of flag as an unsigned number, |
| 145 | + // so no lower bound check is required. |
| 146 | + if (clearFlagRawValue().get().longValue() <= 15) { |
| 147 | + // Set clearFlag to clearFlagRawValue if clearFlagRawValue matches a valid AccountSetFlag variant. |
| 148 | + return AccountSet.builder().from(this) |
| 149 | + .clearFlag(AccountSetFlag.forValue(clearFlagRawValue().get().intValue())) |
| 150 | + .build(); |
| 151 | + } else { |
| 152 | + // Otherwise, leave clearFlag empty. |
| 153 | + return this; |
| 154 | + } |
| 155 | + } |
| 156 | + } |
| 157 | + |
76 | 158 | /** |
77 | 159 | * Unique identifier of a flag to enable for this account. |
78 | 160 | * |
79 | | - * <p>Because the preferred way of setting account flags is with {@link AccountSetFlag}s, this field should not be set |
80 | | - * in conjunction with the {@link AccountSet#flags()} field. |
| 161 | + * <p>If this field is empty, developers should check if {@link #setFlagRawValue()} is also empty. If |
| 162 | + * {@link #setFlagRawValue()} is present, it means that the {@code ClearFlag} field of the transaction was not a |
| 163 | + * valid {@link AccountSetFlag} but was still present in a validated transaction on ledger.</p> |
| 164 | + * |
| 165 | + * <p>Because the preferred way of setting account flags is with {@link AccountSetFlag}s, this field should not be |
| 166 | + * set in conjunction with the {@link AccountSet#flags()} field. |
81 | 167 | * |
82 | 168 | * @return An {@link Optional} of type {@link AccountSetFlag} representing the flag to enable on this account. |
83 | 169 | */ |
84 | | - @JsonProperty("SetFlag") |
| 170 | + @JsonIgnore |
85 | 171 | Optional<AccountSetFlag> setFlag(); |
86 | 172 |
|
| 173 | + /** |
| 174 | + * A flag to disable for this account, as an {@link UnsignedInteger}. |
| 175 | + * |
| 176 | + * <p>Developers should prefer setting {@link #setFlag()} and leaving this field empty when constructing |
| 177 | + * a new {@link AccountSet}. This field is used to serialize and deserialize the {@code "ClearFlag"} field in JSON, |
| 178 | + * as some {@link AccountSet} transactions on the XRPL set the "ClearFlag" field to a number that is not recognized as |
| 179 | + * an asf flag by rippled. Without this field, xrpl4j would fail to deserialize those transactions, as |
| 180 | + * {@link AccountSetFlag} does not support arbitrary integer values.</p> |
| 181 | + * |
| 182 | + * <p>Additionally, using this field as the source of truth for JSON serialization/deserialization rather than |
| 183 | + * {@link #setFlag()} allows developers to recompute the hash of a transaction that was deserialized from a rippled |
| 184 | + * RPC/WS result accurately. An alternative to this field would be to add an enum variant to {@link AccountSetFlag} |
| 185 | + * for unknown values, but binary serializing an {@link AccountSet} that was constructed by deserializing JSON would |
| 186 | + * result in a different binary blob than what exists on ledger.</p> |
| 187 | + * |
| 188 | + * @return An {@link Optional} {@link UnsignedInteger} |
| 189 | + */ |
| 190 | + @JsonProperty("SetFlag") |
| 191 | + Optional<UnsignedInteger> setFlagRawValue(); |
| 192 | + |
| 193 | + /** |
| 194 | + * Normalization method to try to get {@link #setFlag()}and {@link #setFlagRawValue()} to match. |
| 195 | + * |
| 196 | + * <p>If neither field is present, there is nothing to do.</p> |
| 197 | + * <p>If both fields are present, there is nothing to do, but we will check that {@link #setFlag()}'s |
| 198 | + * underlying value equals {@link #setFlagRawValue()}.</p> |
| 199 | + * <p>If {@link #setFlag()} is present but {@link #setFlagRawValue()} is empty, we set |
| 200 | + * {@link #setFlagRawValue()} to the underlying value of {@link #setFlag()}.</p> |
| 201 | + * <p>If {@link #setFlag()} is empty and {@link #setFlagRawValue()} is present, we will set |
| 202 | + * {@link #setFlag()} to the {@link AccountSetFlag} variant associated with {@link #setFlagRawValue()}, or leave |
| 203 | + * {@link #setFlag()} empty if {@link #setFlagRawValue()} does not map to an {@link AccountSetFlag}.</p> |
| 204 | + * |
| 205 | + * @return A normalized {@link AccountSet}. |
| 206 | + */ |
| 207 | + @Value.Check |
| 208 | + default AccountSet normalizeSetFlag() { |
| 209 | + if (!setFlag().isPresent() && !setFlagRawValue().isPresent()) { |
| 210 | + // If both are empty, nothing to do. |
| 211 | + return this; |
| 212 | + } else if (setFlag().isPresent() && setFlagRawValue().isPresent()) { |
| 213 | + // Both will be present if: |
| 214 | + // 1. A developer set them both manually (in the builder) |
| 215 | + // 2. This normalize method has already been called. |
| 216 | + |
| 217 | + // We should still check that the setFlagRawValue matches the inner value of AccountSetFlag. |
| 218 | + Preconditions.checkState( |
| 219 | + setFlag().get().getValue() == setFlagRawValue().get().longValue(), |
| 220 | + String.format("setFlag and setFlagRawValue should be equivalent, but setFlag's underlying " + |
| 221 | + "value was %s and setFlagRawValue was %s", |
| 222 | + setFlag().get().getValue(), |
| 223 | + setFlagRawValue().get().longValue() |
| 224 | + ) |
| 225 | + ); |
| 226 | + return this; |
| 227 | + } else if (setFlag().isPresent() && !setFlagRawValue().isPresent()) { |
| 228 | + // This can only happen if the developer only set setFlag(). In this case, we need to set setFlagRawValue to |
| 229 | + // match setFlag. |
| 230 | + return AccountSet.builder().from(this) |
| 231 | + .setFlagRawValue(UnsignedInteger.valueOf(setFlag().get().getValue())) |
| 232 | + .build(); |
| 233 | + } else { // setFlag is empty and setFlagRawValue is present |
| 234 | + // This can happen if: |
| 235 | + // 1. A developer sets setFlagRawValue manually in the builder |
| 236 | + // 2. JSON has ClearFlag and jackson sets setFlagRawValue. |
| 237 | + // This value will never be negative due to XRPL representing this kind of flag as an unsigned number, |
| 238 | + // so no lower bound check is required. |
| 239 | + if (setFlagRawValue().get().longValue() <= 15) { |
| 240 | + // Set setFlag to setFlagRawValue if setFlagRawValue matches a valid AccountSetFlag variant. |
| 241 | + return AccountSet.builder().from(this) |
| 242 | + .setFlag(AccountSetFlag.forValue(setFlagRawValue().get().intValue())) |
| 243 | + .build(); |
| 244 | + } else { |
| 245 | + // Otherwise, leave setFlag empty. |
| 246 | + return this; |
| 247 | + } |
| 248 | + } |
| 249 | + } |
| 250 | + |
87 | 251 | /** |
88 | 252 | * The hex string of the lowercase ASCII of the domain for the account. For example, the domain example.com would be |
89 | 253 | * represented as "6578616D706C652E636F6D". |
@@ -132,8 +296,8 @@ default AccountSetTransactionFlags flags() { |
132 | 296 | Optional<UnsignedInteger> tickSize(); |
133 | 297 |
|
134 | 298 | /** |
135 | | - * Sets an alternate account that is allowed to mint NFTokens on this |
136 | | - * account's behalf using NFTokenMint's `Issuer` field. |
| 299 | + * Sets an alternate account that is allowed to mint NFTokens on this account's behalf using NFTokenMint's `Issuer` |
| 300 | + * field. |
137 | 301 | * |
138 | 302 | * @return An {@link Optional} field of type {@link Address}. |
139 | 303 | */ |
@@ -206,8 +370,8 @@ default void checkTickSize() { |
206 | 370 | */ |
207 | 371 | enum AccountSetFlag { |
208 | 372 | /** |
209 | | - * This flag will do nothing but exists to accurately deserialize AccountSet transactions whose {@code SetFlag} |
210 | | - * or {@code ClearFlag} fields are zero. |
| 373 | + * This flag will do nothing but exists to accurately deserialize AccountSet transactions whose {@code SetFlag} or |
| 374 | + * {@code ClearFlag} fields are zero. |
211 | 375 | */ |
212 | 376 | NONE(0), |
213 | 377 | /** |
@@ -291,6 +455,7 @@ enum AccountSetFlag { |
291 | 455 | * @param value The int value of the flag. |
292 | 456 | * |
293 | 457 | * @return The {@link AccountSetFlag} for the given integer value. |
| 458 | + * |
294 | 459 | * @see "https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/1850" |
295 | 460 | */ |
296 | 461 | @JsonCreator |
|
0 commit comments