Replies: 9 comments
|
That is a good idea and it can be added easily: But that: will not work: But I give it a try (discussions) too - same procedure like the driver tests in discussions. |
|
Let's see if it is working as expected |
|
Vielen Dank for the quick response. One more idea: |
|
I'm not sure, because the option list is already long: |
|
I think the brief help should be just a clear concise example of an attack that an average user can perform. |
|
That's going a little too far for me. This tools are aimed to experienced users. A user who really need such a detailed help will e.g. never understand a Berkeley Packet Filter or the 4way handshake (inclusive its EAPOL TIME OUT TIMERs or hashccat's NONCE ERROR CORRECTIONS (in case of a packet loss). Adding all this to a help menu will be a bottomless pit. Reading and understanding hcxdumptool's help menu should be the initial obstacle for a user to enter the royal class of penetrating a wireless network: https://www.cyberark.com/resources/threat-research-blog/cracking-wifi-at-scale-with-one-simple-trick |
|
Let's look at it from a different angle. |
|
To get a short overview == -h For most cases, this command line is more than enough: BTW: |
|
BTW: I'll say that none of this tools is addressed to be used by beginners. And experienced users know which options / combination of options should be used. An expanded help would be like a twenty-part (or much more) encyclopedia. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi ZerBea
Let me suggest two ideas to improve the usability of hcxdumptool.
I think it would be nice:
to create an FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) on hcxdumptool
(instead of answering the same questions over and over again)
to split the built-in help into two parts
-h brief help with most common options and examples of typical attacks
--help full help
With best wishes,
V.
All reactions