Add a newly discovered alternative to the README

Author: aaronik

README.md

@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
 
 ## Movement
 
-The movement commands move you through the syntax tree in an intuitive way:
+The movement commands move you through your code in an intuitive way:
 
 * **`:Treewalker Up`** - Moves up to the previous neighbor node, skipping comments, annotations, and other unintuitive nodes
 * **`:Treewalker Down`** - Moves down to the next neighbor node, skipping comments, annotations, and other unintuitive nodes
@@ -156,13 +156,12 @@ vim.keymap.set('n', '<C-S-l>', '<cmd>Treewalker SwapRight<cr>', { silent = true
 ## Alternatives
 
 * [syntax-tree-surfer](https://github.com/ziontee113/syntax-tree-surfer)
-is the closest thing to Treewalker. I only created Treewalker because I
-couldn't get syntax-tree-surfer to work :/. Treewalker has a robust test suite,
-makes use of the type system, has CI (automated testing), and has organized
-code (so the plugin should be pretty stable). I believe Treewalker usage is a
-little bit simpler and more intuitive. Treewalker is missing the visual
-selection swap feature that syntax-tree-surfer has, though. syntax-tree-surfer
-is also publicly archived.
+is publicly archived and I could not get it to work :/
+`Treewalker` has a robust test suite, makes use of the type system, has CI
+(automated testing), and has organized code. So the plugin should be pretty
+stable. I believe `Treewalker` usage is a little bit simpler and more intuitive.
+`Treewalker` is missing the visual selection swap feature that syntax-tree-surfer
+has, though.
 
 * [nvim-treehopper](https://github.com/mfussenegger/nvim-treehopper)
 is similar in that it uses the AST to navigate, but it takes more of a
@@ -185,4 +184,15 @@ of `Treewalker`'s left/right swapping code is inspired by `ts_utils`.
 startwise coinciding node over the lowest. But mostly it does the work of
 finding the next relevant node and packaging it all up into a nice interface.
 
+* [tree-climber.nvim](https://github.com/drybalka/tree-climber.nvim)
+i discovered long after having made `Treewalker`. It seems to be the most
+similar of all of these. It works mostly the same, but with a little bit less
+refinement, including getting stuck on certain nodes, and navigating to nodes
+that don't necessarily seem helpful to go to. In my usage, it seems like
+`tree-climber` gives you more fine grained access to each individual node,
+whereas `Treewalker` takes a more linewise approach which allows you to make
+larger movements more easily. For movement inside of a single line, `Treewalker`
+doesn't help much, whereas `tree-climber` does.
+
+