TL;DR
I understand the intention of the PR description check, but it's actually quite annoying for small changes. For example, https://github.com/abcxyz/infra-github/pull/196 is very self-explanatory. The original commit and title of the PR was "Archive customer-engineering-poc (no longer used)". There didn't seem to be a need for a PR description that wasn't purely duplicative with the title. But the check failed...
Nonetheless, I moved the "no longer used" part into the PR description, but that doesn't trigger the check to re-run. So if you omit a PR description, you're left manually re-running the workflow, which feels really less than ideal.
My suggestion is that we use PR Templates instead of this GitHub Action to achieve the same intent. Or at the very least, reduce this to a warning instead of a blocking error.
Expected behavior
No response
Observed behavior
No response
Environment Details
Additional information
No response
TL;DR
I understand the intention of the PR description check, but it's actually quite annoying for small changes. For example, https://github.com/abcxyz/infra-github/pull/196 is very self-explanatory. The original commit and title of the PR was "Archive customer-engineering-poc (no longer used)". There didn't seem to be a need for a PR description that wasn't purely duplicative with the title. But the check failed...
Nonetheless, I moved the "no longer used" part into the PR description, but that doesn't trigger the check to re-run. So if you omit a PR description, you're left manually re-running the workflow, which feels really less than ideal.
My suggestion is that we use PR Templates instead of this GitHub Action to achieve the same intent. Or at the very least, reduce this to a warning instead of a blocking error.
Expected behavior
No response
Observed behavior
No response
Environment Details
Additional information
No response