We have the Gala tests set up to run against the EXP devel branch when the Gala branch being tested is also devel (otherwise a tagged EXP version is used). However, it doesn't look like there is a Gala devel branch anymore! I think that's why the Gala tests didn't notice the missing EXP header reported in Slack.
@adrn What do you think we should do here? We could make the scheduled tests run against EXP devel, for example, while keeping regular tests against a tagged EXP version.
This is the relevant part of the Gala workflow:
|
# Run tests against a tagged EXP version, unless this is the devel branch or a PR into devel, in which case test against EXP devel |
|
EXP_REF: ${{ (github.ref == 'refs/heads/devel' || (github.event_name == 'pull_request' && github.event.pull_request.base.ref == 'devel')) && 'devel' || 'v7.9.1' }} |
cc @The9Cat
We have the Gala tests set up to run against the EXP
develbranch when the Gala branch being tested is alsodevel(otherwise a tagged EXP version is used). However, it doesn't look like there is a Galadevelbranch anymore! I think that's why the Gala tests didn't notice the missing EXP header reported in Slack.@adrn What do you think we should do here? We could make the scheduled tests run against EXP devel, for example, while keeping regular tests against a tagged EXP version.
This is the relevant part of the Gala workflow:
gala/.github/workflows/tests.yml
Lines 42 to 43 in df919dd
cc @The9Cat