Get rid of GitHub, use gitea

[christian-kreuzberger-dtx]

With the introduction of resource-service in Keptn 0.16 the git upstream became mandatory, which is why GitHub is mandatory for this tutorial.

IMO this just adds an extra step that's confusing for new users, and this is why we published the keptn-gitea-provisioner-service.

In order to use it with Keptn 0.17, the following things have to be done:

1. Install gitea
2. Install keptn-gitea-provisioner-service
3. Install Keptn and configure it to use the gitea-provisioner-service

We have information available on how this works here: https://github.com/keptn-sandbox/keptn-gitea-provisioner-service#quickstart

Acceptance Criteria

• It is no longer needed to have a GH Api Token for the tutorial
• gh CLI is no longer installed
• add approval step refactored such that it works with just the git repo (probably just needs git commands)
• setup keptn step no longer needs to create a repo - that's handled by the provisioner

[agardnerIT]

I disagree. GitHub is widely used and known whereas Gitea is not. It also bloats the installation which is a real issue as we are resource constrained for this tutorial.

Using GitHub.com shows how to use Keptn is a real world scenario whereas Gitea feels too "demo-mode" and would lead to lots of "well Keptn works with this thing called Gitea but does it work with [GitHub | Gitlab ... etc. ]" questions in Slack.

In my experience with Keptn users, the issue isn't using GitHub, it's the fact that Keptn mandates an empty repo - meaning a brand new repo for every test project. I'd rather see the development time, tutorial maintenance effort and issue handling go towards progressing Keptn's folder based structure (which AFAIK will allow non-empty folder usage). Rather than yet-another-dependency on a niche tool like Gitea.

Overall I just don't see the net benefit (in this particular case for using Gitea over GitHub).

Perhaps the creation and use of a GitHub.com provisioner is the solution here?

This is just my opinion though so I'll wait for others to chime in.

[christian-kreuzberger-dtx]

Hi Adam,

I'm absolutely on your side regarding being resource constraint.

Though I need to heavily disagree with the Gitea vs. GitHub part. Depending on what tools you use, you could make a similar comparision about GitHub vs. BitBucket or Azure DevOps or GitLab.

The main feature that you want to demonstrate with Keptn is that it stores project-related files in Git (not GitHub), and that the user has full control over all files. In fact, we can even let the user access Gitea and take a look themselves.

Last but not least, and I can confirm this from many people I have spoken too: Having to create a token on GitHub (as well as a repo) is way too much for a demo/tutorial.

Perhaps the creation and use of a GitHub.com provisioner is the solution here?

Would love to see this, also for other providers, and then the user can choose.