Skip to content

Extensionality? #6

@Taneb

Description

@Taneb

I believe we need to assume the axiom of function extensionality to prove that -> is a functor on Sets, and likely we'll need it to prove other common-in-Haskell functors are indeed functors, for example State.

Do we want these instances requiring extensionality in this library, and if so, where should we put them? I propose Categories.Examples.Functor.Sets.WithExtensionality for example and have the *.WithExtensionality modules parametrized on Extensionality

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions