Skip to content

Question on the packing for 3/4/5/6 bits activations #1

@Darshcg

Description

@Darshcg

Hi team,

Thank you for your contribution.

I have gone through the Terngemm paper and understood that the key ideas in the paper in comparison with gemmlowp are:
1.) TernaryMAC(replacement of muladd operation with the bitwise operation).
2.) Bit-incremental accumulation(avoiding the INT32 accumulation of the partial sums).

I did not get about the packing of low-bit activations(3,4,5,6). Are you converting them to 8-bit and then computing on them, or is there any additional bit packing involved? and also for the ternary weights?

Thanks

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions