Issue with MultipartReader

[thehesiod]

I'm trying to mock the google API batch endpoint which takes a multipart request. It ends up sending a request like this:

--===============0167281537324890874==
Content-Type: application/http
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Content-ID: <ad845523-bc65-4f77-bfad-2b8709570634+1>

GET /gmail/v1/users/me/messages/660cf5e1784d4d98b8d3adeabebb413e?format=metadata&alt=json HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json
MIME-Version: 1.0
accept: application/json
accept-encoding: gzip, deflate
user-agent: google-api-python-client/1.6.2 (gzip)
Authorization: Bearer TOKEN
Host: 192.168.16.6:63191


--===============0167281537324890874==--

with headers:

{'Host': '192.168.16.6:63191', 'Content-Length': '553', 'content-type': 'multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0167281537324890874=="', 'authorization': 'Bearer TOKEN', 'user-agent': 'Python-httplib2/0.10.3 (gzip)', 'accept-encoding': 'gzip, deflate'}

And with a handler like the following:

    async def gmail_batch(self, req: web.Request):
        reader = await req.multipart()
        async for part in reader:
            async for data in part:
                print()

I get the exception:

  File "/Users/amohr/dev/Operations/email_security/svc_tests/mock_google_svcs.py", line 116, in gmail_batch
    async for data in part:
  File "/Users/amohr/.pyenv/versions/3.6.2/lib/python3.6/site-packages/aiohttp/multipart.py", line 235, in __anext__
    part = yield from self.next()
  File "/Users/amohr/.pyenv/versions/3.6.2/lib/python3.6/site-packages/aiohttp/multipart.py", line 242, in next
    item = yield from self.read()
  File "/Users/amohr/.pyenv/versions/3.6.2/lib/python3.6/site-packages/aiohttp/multipart.py", line 261, in read
    data.extend((yield from self.read_chunk(self.chunk_size)))
  File "/Users/amohr/.pyenv/versions/3.6.2/lib/python3.6/site-packages/aiohttp/multipart.py", line 279, in read_chunk
    chunk = yield from self._read_chunk_from_stream(size)
  File "/Users/amohr/.pyenv/versions/3.6.2/lib/python3.6/site-packages/aiohttp/multipart.py", line 322, in _read_chunk_from_stream
    assert self._content_eof < 3, "Reading after EOF"
AssertionError: Reading after EOF

seems like it's not correctly determining the boundary

[thehesiod]

looks like in my example the lines were separated by \n's, and not \r\n

[thehesiod]

I've traced this back to the fact that the default linesep for the email module in python is '\n': https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Lib/email/_policybase.py#L163 used by https://github.com/google/google-api-python-client/blob/master/googleapiclient/http.py#L1328 since policy=None. So the question is should aiohttp check for '\n' + boundary or `\r\n' + boundary as it currently does.

[thehesiod]

in particular the issue is on this line: https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/blob/master/aiohttp/multipart.py#L324

[asvetlov]

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7578 explicitly states CRLF as a separator.
We could support LF also though but I not sure.
Guys, opinions?

[kxepal]

Only if optional to be explicitly enable by user.

From Python docs about linesep:

It defaults to ``\n`` because that is the most useful value for Python application code (other library packages expect ``\n`` separated lines).  ``linesep=\r\n`` can be used to generate output with RFC-compliant line separators.

I think we should stay with RFC by default.

[thehesiod]

Well it's working with Google servers. We should check how other servers behave.

…

On Oct 5, 2017 2:13 AM, "Alexander Shorin" ***@***.***> wrote: Only if optional to be explicitly enable by user. From Python docs about linesep: It defaults to ``\n`` because that is the most useful value for Python application code (other library packages expect ``\n`` separated lines). ``linesep=\r\n`` can be used to generate output with RFC-compliant line separators. I think we should stay with RFC by default. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2302 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD0P_f4VmhADU5gqVrpqjSm-Z59OHLpmks5spJ3AgaJpZM4PuS4i> .

[kxepal]

I don't think this check will change everything. We must follow the specifications in all the questions. That's the only way to make sure we're doing everything right.

However, we have to admit that life is...complicated and legacy still exists and backward compatibility with ancients still have to be preserved by major providers etc. etc. For such cases, if they are really worth to be supported (and if they cannot fix their code due to same BC), well, some fix may have to be implemented, but as opt-in feature.

Even not all browsers correctly support multipart spec, so I think some room of customization is possible here.

[asvetlov]

The issue is still waiting for a hero.
We need to accept separator argument in both multipart reader and writer (\r\n by default).
The change is not very hard but requires some amount of work.

[thehesiod]

btw, I'd like to be able to optionally support both styles, so perhaps a boolean instead of specify if should allow for both?

[asvetlov]

Do you mean a heuristic for detection what style should be used by the reader, \r\n or just \n?
Writer should know the style on construction.