Standards for evidence

[aranas]

User Role

As a user developing assurance cases

Goal / Desire

I want access to clear standards for what makes evidence "sufficient"

Benefit / Reason

so that I can ensure my case meets quality expectations.

Acceptance Criteria

• Criterion 1
• Criterion 2
• Criterion 3

Additional Notes / Considerations

No response

[chrisdburr]

Not an easy one to address, unfortunately.

A module has been planned for the curriculum to discuss this, but the main challenge is that what constitutes "sufficient" is dependent on factors such as community norms, regulatory environments, and (of course) the context of use for the model or system.

The TEA Techniques database goes some way to address this, but there will always be some gaps that must be addressed by the team through internal reflection and deliberation.