Skip to content

keephq-snmp-sponsor-cleanup-preview-2026-04-30.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
43 lines (29 loc) · 3.29 KB

keephq-snmp-sponsor-cleanup-preview-2026-04-30.md

File metadata and controls

43 lines (29 loc) · 3.29 KB

Paid-output preview: keephq/keep SNMP bounty sponsor cleanup

Freshness: checked 2026-04-30T22:13Z via GitHub public API/search.
Scope: public GitHub issue/PR metadata only. No private data, no bounty claim, no implementation work, no public sales note posted into the issue.

Why this row is the strongest sponsor-ops proof

Source issue: keephq/keep#2112 — SNMP provider

Visible buyer/sponsor signal:

  • labels include 💎 Bounty and $4.5k;
  • issue is still open, unlocked, unassigned, and updated 2026-04-30;
  • issue has 73 comments from 55 distinct users;
  • the Algora bot comment lists multiple rewarded/attempted solutions and warns that low-quality AI PRs will be closed;
  • fresh GitHub PR search found 20 open SNMP-provider PR candidates in the first page of results, including #6390, #6389, #6387, #6299, #6289, #6267, #6260, and older still-open attempts.

This is exactly the queue shape the paid data product is meant to clean: sponsor money is visible, but maintainer attention is diluted across repeated /attempt comments and many overlapping PRs.

Example cleanup row I would deliver in the paid table

Field Public-data readout
Repo / issue keephq/keep#2112
Amount signal $4.5k label plus Algora bounty bot history
Current status Open; no GitHub assignee; latest issue comment asks for assignment after a same-day PR attempt
Thread noise 73 comments; 47 /attempt comments; 6 /claim references; multiple duplicate /attempt comments by the same account
Open PR collision First-page search finds 20 open SNMP-provider PRs; several look like overlapping implementations rather than distinct maintainer asks
Maintainer risk Review burden is now likely higher than the implementation decision: many claimants, no obvious single winner, and repeated low-context attempts
Recommended sponsor action Post a single maintainer note freezing new attempts for 48h, listing the PRs still under review, and asking existing PR authors for one demo video + compatibility matrix instead of new /attempts
Paid tier fit $100 one-repo cleanup table; $150 if monitoring the PR queue for 7 days and updating the top-candidate/duplicate map

Ready-to-post maintainer clarification snippet

Thanks everyone — this bounty has enough active attempts for now. Please avoid new /attempt comments until we finish the first review pass. If you already have a PR open, add one short demo video plus a compatibility note covering trap receive mode, SNMP v1/v2c/v3 support, tests, and any polling behavior. We will prioritize PRs that clearly map to the original provider requirement and close duplicates/low-context submissions to keep review manageable.

Conversion route

If a maintainer/sponsor wants the full table, email alce.ops@gmail.com with subject BOUNTY_SPONSOR ops cleanup, repo URL, role, and $100 or $150 tier. The output uses only public issue/PR metadata and does not claim or implement the bounty.

Kill condition

If this named paid-output preview plus the broader Algora sample gets zero qualified maintainer/sponsor signal after the next monitor window, park bounty-cleanup as Data Products' primary SKU and replace it with a different active-buyer public-data product.