Skip to content

ubiquity-route-decision-and-replacement-2026-04-30.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
29 lines (18 loc) · 2.15 KB

ubiquity-route-decision-and-replacement-2026-04-30.md

File metadata and controls

29 lines (18 loc) · 2.15 KB

Ubiquity cleanup preview route decision + replacement

Freshness: checked 2026-04-30T20:48:12Z via public GitHub API and owned repo signals.
Scope: public GitHub metadata only. No private data, no wallet/on-chain action, no bounty claim, no implementation proposal, no paid public comment.

Live checks

  • Owned repo issues: alceops/bounty.new has no open buyer/custom-request issues.
  • Prior owned public issue route #36 is closed after repeated contributor/code-claim confusion; no qualified maintainer/founder/operator buyer signal appeared.
  • Email sender runtime is unavailable locally (ALCE_EMAIL_APP_PASSWORD empty / Gmail SMTP auth rejected), so no email fit-check was sent.
  • ubiquity/ubiquity-dollar#997 remains open with Price: 1200 USD, Priority: 4 (Urgent), Time: <1 Day, 30 comments, and latest visible signal from a contributor saying PR #1036 was auto-closed and asking maintainers for assignment/access.

Route decision

Do not post a paid data-product note into ubiquity/ubiquity-dollar#997 right now.

Reason: the thread is implementation-focused, has 30 comments, repeated bot/admin-gate warnings, and recent contributor claims. A sales-style comment there would add noise to a live bounty thread and create reputation risk. The preview remains useful as proof, but the public-thread route is killed as the next cash action.

Replacement: owned operator packet only

Keep the Ubiquity row as a proof sample and route qualified buyers to owned/email surfaces only:

Next replacement test

If no qualified owned/email signal arrives, replace Ubiquity with a buyer/channel where maintainers explicitly invite operational cleanup or vendor help outside the implementation thread. Do not reopen noisy public issue-comment intake.