resultsFooterComponent example not working

[kai687]

In the docs for resultsFooterComponent there's a link to a code sandbox:

You can find a working example without JSX in this sandbox

But in the DocSearch UI, you can see that the DocSearch-HitsFooter is an empty section.
So it seems that this example is broken. Can you fix it and show an example how to add a footer without using JSX?

[randombeeper]

@kai687 I was going to look at this but am confused by your link. I see that the link here in this issue goes to a sample which does not use resultsFooterComponent. But if I go to our docs at https://docsearch.algolia.com/docs/api/#resultsfootercomponent and click on the link there, I'm taken to https://codesandbox.io/p/sandbox/docsearch-v3-resultsfootercomponent-without-jsx-jperd5 which does show resultsFooterComponent. I'm wondering where you could have got https://codesandbox.io/p/sandbox/docsearch-v3-maxresultspergroup-without-jsx-ct9m22?file=%2Fsrc%2Findex.js from?

Thanks!

[shortcuts]

@randombeeper seems like it's the playground link of the next section in the docs https://docsearch.algolia.com/docs/api/#maxresultspergroup

[kai687]

Sorry, it looks like I pasted the wrong link. I'm on this code sandbox:

https://codesandbox.io/s/docsearch-v3-resultsfootercomponent-without-jsx-jperd5

I don't see any footer though. It's an empty <section>. Does it look different in your preview?

[fabianrbz]

We stated to see this in our app too. The resultsFooterComponent is no longer being rendered, we are using the Javascript version fwiw.

[Mister-Hope]

This also affect hitComponent in both vuepress and vitepress. We are not including a jsx env by default in vue projects.

• vuepress workaround: vuepress/ecosystem@108c888
• vitepress workaround: vuejs/vitepress@e035027

It would be great if the team can get it fixed soon, as we can not bypass this issue and you can see that the fixes were introduced a month ago.

@shortcuts @randombeeper

In other word, JSX should never be considered available with docsearch/js package, so it's weird to have any JSX elements expected in docsearch/js pacakge.

Even if a solution without jsx is again available, I believe the docs needs an update to clearly describe what to do without jsx.

[psz-basler]

Our online documentation uses the code from the example as well. Sometimes it shows up, but rarely and unpredictable. The example sandbox that I also found in the documentation does not work. Did you change something in the docsearch library?