Best Workflow in Meshroom for Drone Images with Geolocation (Solar Simulation Use Case) #2785
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
|
I discovered the issue was actually related to the coordinates. In SketchUp, there’s an option to manually insert them, and after doing that, the shadows aligned correctly with the real ones for that specific date. I also found out that Meshroom doesn’t use GPS data from pictures by default. However, there’s a node that should fix this: SfMTransform → from_gps. Has anyone successfully used this node? If someone could share a working .mg file with the correct pipeline, I’d be really grateful! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,
I’m working on generating 3D models from drone images using Meshroom, and I’d like some guidance on the best workflow or pipeline configuration. Our main use case is for solar energy projects, where we simulate shadows cast by surrounding objects and evaluate optimal placement for solar panels on buildings.
Since geolocation accuracy is critical for our simulations, I’d like to know:
What is the recommended pipeline in Meshroom when processing drone imagery with GPS data?
Are there specific node settings or best practices to ensure both high-quality 3D reconstruction and precise georeferencing?
Any tips to balance quality with performance (so we don’t run into excessive RAM usage) would also be appreciated.
Is ou
Additional Context
Drone used: DJI Mini 3
Pipeline: Default nodes with some tweaks to reduce 3D model size
Issue observed: In one of my current projects, the shadow in the 3D model appears shorter than the real-world shadow. This makes me suspect that the GPS coordinates from the drone images might not be fully accurate, or perhaps not being used by Meshroom at all. For this test, I exported the model and visualized it in SketchUp Pro 2019.
Thanks in advance for any insights!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions