chore(deps): document CVE-2026-34040 docker/docker AuthZ bypass — patched version unavailable#510
Draft
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
chore(deps): document CVE-2026-34040 docker/docker AuthZ bypass — patched version unavailable#510Copilot wants to merge 1 commit into
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Fix AuthZ plugin bypass for oversized request bodies
chore(deps): document CVE-2026-34040 docker/docker AuthZ bypass — patched version unavailable
Apr 23, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Dependabot alert for CVE-2026-34040 / GHSA-x744-4wpc-v9h2 (Moby AuthZ plugin bypass via oversized request bodies) against
github.com/docker/docker v28.5.2+incompatible. The fix requiresv29.3.1+incompatible, which does not yet exist in the Go module proxy.Status: Cannot be resolved automatically
go get github.com/docker/docker@latestresolves tov28.5.2+incompatible— nov29.xis indexedtestcontainers-goalso pinsgithub.com/docker/docker@v28.5.2+incompatible, so both would need simultaneous updatesReachability Assessment — Not reachable (high confidence)
Advisory is explicit: "If you don't use AuthZ plugins, you are not affected."
github.com/docker/dockeris imported only in test files forapi/types/containerandapi/types/mounttype definitions (testcontainers integration tests)github.com/docker/dockerdirectlyAffected test files (type imports only):
pkg/rerankings/hf/huggingface_test.gopkg/api/v2/collection_http_integration_test.gopkg/api/v2/client_local_crosslang_integration_test.gopkg/api/v2/client_http_integration_test.goAction required (human reviewer)
Monitor the Go module proxy for
github.com/docker/docker v29.3.1+incompatibleand update bothgithub.com/docker/dockerandgithub.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-gosimultaneously when available.Warning
Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses (expand for details)
I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:
https://api.github.com/repos/moby/moby/releases/latest/usr/bin/curl curl -s REDACTED(http block)If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:
Original prompt
This section details the Dependabot vulnerability alert you should resolve
<alert_title>Moby has AuthZ plugin bypass when provided oversized request bodies</alert_title>
<alert_description>## Summary
A security vulnerability has been detected that allows attackers to bypass authorization plugins (AuthZ) under specific circumstances. The base likelihood of this being exploited is low.
This is an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-41110.
Impact
If you don't use AuthZ plugins, you are not affected.
Using a specially-crafted API request, an attacker could make the Docker daemon forward the request to an authorization plugin without the body. The authorization plugin may allow a request which it would have otherwise denied if the body had been forwarded to it.
Anyone who depends on authorization plugins that introspect the request body to make access control decisions is potentially impacted.
Workarounds
If unable to update immediately:
Credits
Resources
high
https://github.com/moby/moby/security/advisories/GHSA-v23v-6jw2-98fq https://github.com/moby/moby/security/advisories/GHSA-x744-4wpc-v9h2 https://github.com/moby/moby/commit/e89edb19ad7de0407a5d31e3111cb01aa10b5a38 https://docs.docker.com/engine/extend/plugins_authorization https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34040 https://github.com/moby/moby/releases/tag/docker-v29.3.1 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-x744-4wpc-v9h2GHSA-x744-4wpc-v9h2, CVE-2026-34040
github.com/docker/docker
go
<vulnerable_versions>= v28.5.2+incompatible</vulnerable_versions>
<patched_version></patched_version>
<manifest_path>go.mod</manifest_path>
<task_instructions>Resolve this alert by updating the affected package to a non-vulnerable version. Prefer the lowest non-vulnerable version (see the patched_version field above) over the latest to minimize breaking changes. Include a Reachability Assessment section in the PR description. Review the alert_description field to understand which APIs, features, or configurations are affected, then search the codebase for usage of those specific items. If the vulnerable code path is reachable, explain how (which files, APIs, or call sites use the affected functionality) and note that the codebase is actively exposed to this vulnerability. If the vulnerable code path is not reachable, explain why (e.g. the affected API is never called, the vulnerable configuration is not used) and note that the update is primarily to satisfy vulnerability scanners rather than to address an active risk. If the advisory is too vague to determine reachability (e.g. 'improper input validation' with no specific API named), state that reachability could not be determined and explain why. Include a confidence level in the reachability assessment (e.g. high confidence if the advisory names a specific API and you confirmed it is or is not called, low confidence if the usage is indirect and hard to trace). If no patched version is available, check the alert_description field for a Workarounds section — the advisory may describe configuration changes or usage patterns that mitigate the vulnerability without a version update. If a workaround is available, apply it and leave a code comment referencing the advisory identifier explaining it is a temporary mitigation. If neither a patch nor a workaround is available, explain in the PR description why the alert cannot be resolved automatically so a human reviewer can take over. Inspect the repository to determine which package manager is used (e.g. lock files, config files, build scripts) and use that tooling to perform the update — do not edit lock files directly. If the version constraint in the manifest (e.g. package.json, Gemfile, pyproject.toml) caps the version below the fix, update the constraint first. For transitive dependencies, determine whether it is simpler to update the direct dependency that pulls in the vulnerable package or to update the transitive dependency directly, and choose the least disruptive approach. If upgrading to fix the vulnerability forces a major version bump or known breaking changes, review the changelog or release notes, then audit the codebase for usage of affected APIs and fix any breaking ch...