Apparent ambiguous interpretation of parser rule names #4912
Unanswered
The-Futurist
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I have two parser rules,
ifandiFbut use of the latter seems to lead to an exception when the generated Java is compiled. If I rename ruleiFto sayiXthe problem goes away. This suggest that despiteifandiFbeing legal distinct names, something in the generated Java is making some assumptions.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions