-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BEAM-6394] Add support to write protobuf data using ProtoParquetReader #34063
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Checks are failing. Will not request review until checks are succeeding. If you'd like to override that behavior, comment |
assign set of reviewers |
Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment R: @kennknowles for label java. Available commands:
The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments). |
@Abacn Could you please take a look? Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! This is a good start. Left a few comments
@@ -616,6 +621,9 @@ public abstract static class ReadFiles | |||
|
|||
abstract Builder toBuilder(); | |||
|
|||
// New: flag to indicate using ProtoParquetReader for protobuf data. | |||
abstract boolean getUseProtoReader(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
consider using a enum type parameter (AVRO / PROTO) and defaults to AVRO? This allows flexibility for future additions.
|
||
// Get the configuration and set the property using the literal. | ||
Configuration conf2 = getConfWithModelClass(); | ||
conf2.set("parquet.proto.ignore.unknown.fields", "TRUE"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is the purpose of "ignore.unknown.fields" here? In general we should not set unsafe configure for user if they are not aware of
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
return; // exit after using the proto path |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For readability, I would recommend structure the code, e.g.
getParquetFileReader() {
switch (FORMAT) {
case AVRO: return getParquetAvroReader()
case PROTO: return getParquetProtoReader()
}
}
instead of branching in place
Reminder, please take a look at this pr: @kennknowles @johnjcasey |
Assigning new set of reviewers because Pr has gone too long without review. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment R: @robertwb for label java. Available commands:
|
waiting on author |
Please add a meaningful description for your change here
Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:
addresses #123
), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, commentfixes #<ISSUE NUMBER>
instead.CHANGES.md
with noteworthy changes.See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.
To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md
GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)
See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.