You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
User password reset request responds as successful, but fails silently - TTL Issue #13604
When a user requests a password reset at the login page, with password reset emails enabled, it returns a successful message to the user and emails them a reset token.
If the user requests another reset within that token's window (user.password.reset.ttl), it will still return a successful message to the user but willl fail internally with the message: DEBUG [o.a.c.u.UserPasswordResetManagerImpl] Failed to reset token and send email. Password reset token is already set for user user@emaildomain.com in domain id: xy with account primary and email user@emaildomain.com
This doesn't appear in the event log of the user either.
versions
4.22.1.0
The steps to reproduce the bug
Have settings enabled for user password reset (user.password.reset.enabled = true) and an email host configured (user.password.reset.smtp.host)
Request a password reset.
Observe the first reset email.
Request another password reset.
What to do about it?
There's a few issues here I think should be addressed:
Consider if password reset attemps should be visible in the user's Event's page. It might create spam in the events list, so might not be a good idea.
Consider either:
Allowing a user to re-request a new password reset token and reset the TTL window using the new token (my desired outcome, and what I'd expect end-users would be familiar with).
If not the above, then wait for the email to be successfully queued/sent and return the success from that. If the email isn't sent due to the token being within the TTL, then return a user-friendly message that they cannot request a new token until a specified datetime.
Allowing a user to re-request a new password reset token and reset the TTL window using the new token (my desired outcome, and what I'd expect end-users would be familiar with).
If not the above, then wait for the email to be successfully queued/sent and return the success from that. If the email isn't sent due to the token being within the TTL, then return a user-friendly message that they cannot request a new token until a specified datetime.
I think a third option could be
if within the ttl window, resend the existing token.
that said handling the silent fail is the major issue.
I had a think about this and I still believe most implementations would issue a new token on each request.
Issuing a new token rotates the token and resets the expiry together. Resending the existing token requires that we either:
Keep the original expiry, which is confusing if the user asks near the end of the window as the link may only work for a few minutes, or
Reset the expiry, which lets a single token live indefinitely, provided the rate limit allows it.
Activity
DaanHoogland commentedon Jul 27, 2026
I think a third option could be
that said handling the silent fail is the major issue.
MitchDrage commentedon Nov 10, 2026
I had a think about this and I still believe most implementations would issue a new token on each request.
Keep the original expiry, which is confusing if the user asks near the end of the window as the link may only work for a few minutes, or
Reset the expiry, which lets a single token live indefinitely, provided the rate limit allows it.
Raising a PR for option 1.