Skip to content

Commit c975a97

Browse files
committed
Changes.md: fix typos.
1 parent 8197044 commit c975a97

1 file changed

Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions

File tree

CHANGES.md

Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Complete refactoring of the SSH transport protocol. New feature: support for cli
2525
## Bug Fixes
2626

2727
* [GH-502](https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/502) Don't load security provider classes reflectively
28-
for Bouncy Castle and `net.isp.crypto:eddsa:0.3.0`.
28+
for Bouncy Castle and `net.i2p.crypto:eddsa:0.3.0`.
2929

3030
## Major Code Re-factoring
3131

@@ -45,10 +45,10 @@ Complete refactoring of the SSH transport protocol. New feature: support for cli
4545

4646
With this change `sshd-common` and `sshd-osgi` become MRJARs (multi-release JARs). When run on Java >= 15,
4747
Apache MINA SSHD will use the built-in ed25519 from the SunEC security provider. On Java < 15, ed25519 is
48-
supported if Bouncy Castle or `net.isp.crypto:eddsa:0.3.0` is present.
48+
supported if Bouncy Castle or `net.i2p.crypto:eddsa:0.3.0` is present.
4949

50-
On Java >= 15, Apache MINA SSHD will use the JDK ed25519 even if Bouncy Castle or `net.isp.crypto:eddsa:0.3.0`
51-
are present. (Including `net.isp.crypto:eddsa:0.3.0` makes no sense on Java >= 15.) There is a new
50+
On Java >= 15, Apache MINA SSHD will use the JDK ed25519 even if Bouncy Castle or `net.i2p.crypto:eddsa:0.3.0`
51+
are present. (Including `net.i2p.crypto:eddsa:0.3.0` makes no sense on Java >= 15.) There is a new
5252
[registrar](./docs/security-providers.md) `SunECSecurityProviderRegistrar` with the name "SunECWrapper". It
5353
is by default registered ahead of the Bouncy Castle or net.i2p registrars, and has by default ed25519,
5454
X25519, and X448 enabled if SunEC is registered and has these algorithms. This new registrar can be

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)