Add more rigor to the spec using LinkML #67
jdsnyderii
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 2 comments
|
Plus one here, LinkML seems very closely related in spirit and an alignment with the linkml schema and tooling would be super valuable. |
0 replies
|
Hi! I've submitted a PR to add Ossie -> LinkML and LinkML -> Ossie converters: #389 Note that LinkML already has a lot of generators in LinkML-Scala and LinkML-Py, which convert to formats such as SHACL, RDFS, or OWL. This might be useful? We could have Ossie -> RDFS conversion, for example, by daisy-chaining converters. I'd be also interested if you have any other ideas for where the alignment could lie. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I would like to provide a suggestion that capturing this specification in ways that get more leverage in the "AI" world as well as generation is worth considering.
Specifically, the LinkML modeling language seems very well suited to this effort and is very expressive for this kind of problem set. The meta model of everything can be captured and generated including but not limited to the JSON-schema but also data formats and W3C friendly concepts like SHACL and OWL and Turtle, etc.
All reactions