chore(geopandas): Add more edge cases to the `test_match_geopandas_series.py` suite

[petern48]

test_match_geopandas_series.py is where we compare that our results match the results of geopandas. We reuse the same lists of geometries (e.g self.linestrings, self.geoms, etc) in nearly every test. I wrote these cases very early and failed to consider various edge cases. In this issue, I'd like to add some test cases to these lists (e.g self.linestrings). I wouldn't be surprised if we fail some of these.

Here are the edge cases I think we should add. I think each of these should be their own PR, since it's possible that they cause test failures and require us to modify the implementation of existing sedona geopandas functions.

• empty geometries (e.g POINT EMPTY)
• non-valid polygons (e.g POLYGON((0 0, 0 1, 2 1, 2 2, 1 2, 1 0, 0 0)), see here to learn about validity)
• GeometryCollections cases (apparently, there's only one case at the moment...)
  • geom with only empty geometries
  • geom collection w/ only a single geom (e.g is_closed only applies to linestrings, should it return true for this GeomCol (< a single closed linestring >)?
• Z and M dimensions for everything
• Other geometry types that Sedona doesn't support (e.g LinearRing, box)

Here's an example of the current cases (and hence where we would need to add more cases).

sedona/python/tests/geopandas/test_match_geopandas_series.py

Lines 59 to 67 in 6dc39e7

	self.points = [Point(x, x + 1) for x in range(3)]
	self.multipoints = [MultiPoint([(x, x + 1), (x + 2, x + 3)]) for x in range(3)]
	self.linestrings = [LineString([(x, x + 1), (x + 2, x + 3)]) for x in range(3)]
	self.linearrings = [
	LinearRing([(x, x), (x + 1, x), (x + 1, x + 1), (x, x + 1), (x, x)])
	for x in range(3)