Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Hi @JHoelli, thanks a lot for opening this discussion. @luoluoyuyu, what are your thoughts? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Update on the renaming and deprecation: details are in #4039 . We’ve also refactored PipelineFlowMetrics into sp_core_pipeline_element_data_total, which now records sent and received data per element per pipeline. The previous Flow Metrics should be derivable via query from this new metric. Any concerns or suggestions on the new metric structure? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Currently we do not really have a naming convention for Prometheus metrics (https://prometheus.io/docs/practices/naming/).
The idea is to structure the metric naming to prefix_componentName_function_unit.
As Prefix I would propose:
For the current metrics this scheme would result in :
Pipelines
Adapter
Load Balancer
Memory
Service
Rate Limiter
Any opinions on the approach ?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions