Is there an existing issue for this?
Summary
hey, i work on Zenith Hosting, a startup doing one-click hosting for open source apps. we added Appsmith to our marketplace, so i would like to add one row to the Installation Methods table in README.md, alongside the existing Docker / Kubernetes / AWS AMI rows, linking to https://zenith.hosting/host/appsmith.
it would be a single line, additions only, using a height-matched badge so it sits level with the existing for-the-badge shields. it is meant as one more option in that list, not as a replacement for any of them, and it does not touch the Appsmith Cloud line above the table.
raising this first per the contribution guidelines. PR #42078 is already open as a draft with the exact diff if it is easier to look at that.
Why should this be worked on?
people who want self-hosted Appsmith rather than Appsmith Cloud currently have to run and maintain the server themselves, which is where a chunk of them stall. the table is the place they look for that, so listing a managed option there is one less dead end for the non-devops end of your self-host audience.
happy to reword it, move it, or close this if you would rather not link third-party hosts in the README. we also share a cut of revenue with the projects we host, happy to explain if you're curious: hello@zenith.hosting
Is there an existing issue for this?
Summary
hey, i work on Zenith Hosting, a startup doing one-click hosting for open source apps. we added Appsmith to our marketplace, so i would like to add one row to the Installation Methods table in
README.md, alongside the existing Docker / Kubernetes / AWS AMI rows, linking to https://zenith.hosting/host/appsmith.it would be a single line, additions only, using a height-matched badge so it sits level with the existing
for-the-badgeshields. it is meant as one more option in that list, not as a replacement for any of them, and it does not touch the Appsmith Cloud line above the table.raising this first per the contribution guidelines. PR #42078 is already open as a draft with the exact diff if it is easier to look at that.
Why should this be worked on?
people who want self-hosted Appsmith rather than Appsmith Cloud currently have to run and maintain the server themselves, which is where a chunk of them stall. the table is the place they look for that, so listing a managed option there is one less dead end for the non-devops end of your self-host audience.
happy to reword it, move it, or close this if you would rather not link third-party hosts in the README. we also share a cut of revenue with the projects we host, happy to explain if you're curious: hello@zenith.hosting