Add 'therefore' as a premise type ∴

[colinmegill]

∴

[colinmegill]

Yes, as conclusions. Excellent questions, certainly. I would imagine a group of 'because' ie., positive statements would be grouped together in support of a therefore, that's rather how legal language proceeds (ie., wherein)

…

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:26 PM Fatih Erikli ***@***.***> wrote: Could you give us more context or examples? Therefore premises should be the conclusion of the argument, right? I have a few questions in that case: - Would an argument contain more than one therefores? - How do we approve a therefore conclusion as a community in an argument? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#327 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABsDGUaS2Rg3rru9ES22wVJNBcm3MRGPks5rtDEtgaJpZM4M0rtN> .

[colinmegill]

Wonderful. Yes, that's what was in my mind as well. It's rather nice to think of being able to visualize how people 'weight' things, ie., different people will come to different conclusions using different sets of positive individual premises, the sidebar would allow them to click through and compare outcomes.

…

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 6:00 PM Fatih Erikli ***@***.***> wrote: So as I see, the therefore should be a premise-group in an argument, not an individual premise-type. It's more clear now in that case. Would be great to having such a feature. We can plan the feature as user stories. Here is my first tryout. Creating a conclusion scenario: Story: User wants to create a new `therefore` or `conclusion` on an argument Clicks new conclusion button Picks one or more than one premises from current argument Types a title and clicks submit button A scenario for listing conclusions: Story: User wants to navigate on a conclusion Conclusions are listed on the sidebar Users clicks one of the listed conclusions Argument map highlights with a different stroke color the picked premises in conclusion What do you think? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#327 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABsDGSQeVDhEh5hSCe5wmh_p62pMqAONks5rtDkugaJpZM4M0rtN> .

[colinmegill]

This make it in?

…

On Wed, Nov 28, 2018, 11:06 PM Fatih Erikli ***@***.***> wrote: Closed #327 <#327>. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#327 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABsDGaTBYs7jZEO7pTiRFH0V7g4Tc0dSks5uzwjUgaJpZM4M0rtN> .