qwik for qwind is not as fast as expected. #20
Description
https://qwind.pages.dev/ is as fast as my nextjs app but is nowhere close to https://qwik.builder.io/ which is very strange.
Given that qwik.builder.io uses same tailwind and qwik , qwind should be closer to it.
I guess we are missing something, we haven't fully got the performance that we came here for.
Even your other templates like https://astrowind.vercel.app/ or https://onwidget.com/ or https://tailnext.vercel.app/ are faster.
Documenting last 5 measured scores on https://pagespeed.web.dev
| Page | Mobile Speed | Median Mobile Speed | Desktop Speed | Median Desktop Speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://qwind.pages.dev/ | 83,96,95,96,96 | 96 | 100,100,100,100,100 | 100 |
| https://qwind.vercel.app/ | 95,95,95,95,95 | 95 | 100,100,100,100,100 | 100 |
| https://qwik.builder.io/ | 99,98,100,93,98 | 98 | 100,100,100,100,100 | 100 |
| https://astrowind.vercel.app/ | 99,100,99,100,100 | 100 | 100,100,100,100,100 | 100 |
| https://tailnext.vercel.app/ | 94,97,92,87,95,92,91,93,94 | 93 | 77,78,99,96,90,99,78,100,100 | 96 |
| https://onwidget.com/ | 90 | 90 | 98 | 98 |
I tried both https://qwind.pages.dev and https://qwind.vercel.app to ensure the issue is not with hosting.
All your astro homes are blazingly fast. As per most other people's benchmarking is concerned qwik is the quickest. I expected qwik to be faster than astro but maybe for simple single page landing page astro beats qwik.
Anyway I would suggest keep this issue open until we find out what's slowing it down, so that I can revisit it and update with my findings from time to time.