[BUG] JMS server binding properties incorrect type

[fmvilas]

Describe the bug.

I'm looking at the JMS server binding and the properties and its type is Schema Array, which points to a non-existing place 🤔 By looking at the example, the properties have the following shape:

properties:
  - name: nameOfTheProperty1
    value: valueOfTheProperty1
  - name: nameOfTheProperty2
    value: valueOfTheProperty2
 ...

This is definitely not an array of schemas 😄 So I'm thinking there may be a typo there. In fact, looking at the JSON Schema definition, we got this: https://github.com/asyncapi/spec-json-schemas/blob/master/bindings/jms/0.0.1/server.json#L21.

@rcoppen @SrfHead

Expected behavior

To have a well-defined shape.

Screenshots

No screenshots.

How to Reproduce

N/A

🥦 Browser

None

👀 Have you checked for similar open issues?

• I checked and didn't find similar issue

🏢 Have you read the Contributing Guidelines?

• I have read the Contributing Guidelines

Are you willing to work on this issue ?

No, someone else can work on it

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

[fmvilas]

I think this is important. Let's not leave it stale.

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️