exclude emeritus from voting overview

[derberg]

we show voting overview in https://github.com/asyncapi/community/blob/master/TSC_VOTING_OVERVIEW.md

data file is here: https://github.com/asyncapi/community/blob/master/voteTrackingFile.json

all implementation details are in: #1278

the thing is that we should not show in the voting overview people that are no longer TSC members but emeritus

example of person that is visible in voting, but no longer tsc member: https://github.com/asyncapi/community/blob/master/MAINTAINERS.yaml#L194

cc @AayushSaini101 who might guide you with the work

[kaneki003]

I would like to work on this issue. Please assign it to me if no one else's working

[rohithyarramala]

hello @derberg [ lukasz ], i see the issue not completed by previous contributer, can work on it.

[derberg]

sure but #1837 needs to be merged first. The current code is a mess, refactor is needed. So plan to to get each function one by one properly tested

[rohithyarramala]

sure @derberg , is i need to wait for its merge or work on this , by refer to the #1837 changes ,

[derberg]

yeah, and don't see any other option than waiting - maybe you can already do some pseudo code, or some preps, I don't know

[derberg]

@Nandgopal-R do you still want to continue with this topic after #1837 is merged? or not really?

[rohithyarramala]

If @Nandgopal-R can't continue, I can look ahead

[derberg]

@rohithyarramala lets give @Nandgopal-R like time until the end of Thursday to respond - as he was first and alrady did some good stuff. We are not in a rush. If he doesn't respond, on friday this one is yours

[Nandgopal-R]

@Nandgopal-R do you still want to continue with this topic after #1837 is merged? or not really?

Ya, sure! I’d like to continue with it

[rohithyarramala]

@Nandgopal-R , ok bro , thanks for reply

[derberg]

@rohithyarramala go ahead, I see no new PR in that topic

[derberg]

and just clarify, next PR should address further refactoring, like in previous PR from @Nandgopal-R

open to your suggestions what that could be

one function per PR to make review super easy