Skip to content

better linting standards #1

better linting standards

better linting standards #1

Triggered via pull request December 7, 2025 02:17
Status Failure
Total duration 4m 59s
Artifacts

lint.yml

on: pull_request
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

10 errors and 10 warnings
Lint & Type Check: app/hackathons/edit/page.tsx#L812
Unexpected constant nullishness on the left-hand side of a `??` expression
Lint & Type Check: app/hackathons/edit/page.tsx#L810
Unexpected constant nullishness on the left-hand side of a `??` expression
Lint & Type Check
Empty block statement
Lint & Type Check
Empty block statement
Lint & Type Check
Empty block statement
Lint & Type Check
Empty block statement
Lint & Type Check
Empty block statement
Lint & Type Check
Empty block statement
Lint & Type Check: app/api/hackathons/[id]/route.ts#L56
Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object
Lint & Type Check: app/api/hackathons/[id]/route.ts#L33
Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object
Lint & Type Check: .source/index.ts#L10
Insert `;`
Lint & Type Check: .source/index.ts#L9
Insert `;`
Lint & Type Check: .source/index.ts#L8
Insert `;`
Lint & Type Check: .source/index.ts#L7
Insert `;`
Lint & Type Check: .source/index.ts#L6
Insert `;`
Lint & Type Check: .source/index.ts#L5
Insert `;`
Lint & Type Check: .source/index.ts#L4
Insert `;`
Lint & Type Check: .source/index.ts#L3
Insert `;`
Lint & Type Check: .source/index.ts#L2
Insert `;`
Lint & Type Check: .source/index.ts#L1
Do not use "@ts-nocheck" because it alters compilation errors