Skip to content

feat(ec2-alpha): nested ipam pool # #34359

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sbeginCoveo
Copy link

Issue # (if applicable)

Closes #34178

Reason for this change

Need to create nested ipam pools

Description of changes

Add support for nested ipam pools in the alpha l2 constructs

Describe any new or updated permissions being added

none

Description of how you validated changes

added unit tests

Checklist


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

@github-actions github-actions bot added the beginning-contributor [Pilot] contributed between 0-2 PRs to the CDK label May 5, 2025
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team May 5, 2025 19:41
@github-actions github-actions bot added effort/medium Medium work item – several days of effort feature-request A feature should be added or improved. p2 labels May 5, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(This review is outdated)

@sbeginCoveo sbeginCoveo changed the title chore(aws-ec2-alpha): nested ipam pool using sourceIpamPoolId feat(ec2-alpha): nested ipam pool using sourceIpamPoolId May 5, 2025
@sbeginCoveo sbeginCoveo changed the title feat(ec2-alpha): nested ipam pool using sourceIpamPoolId chore(ec2-alpha): nested ipam pool # May 5, 2025
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation dismissed their stale review May 5, 2025 19:49

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added the pr/needs-community-review This PR needs a review from a Trusted Community Member or Core Team Member. label May 5, 2025
@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: e32f5ce
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@paulhcsun paulhcsun changed the title chore(ec2-alpha): nested ipam pool # feat(ec2-alpha): nested ipam pool # May 6, 2025
@paulhcsun
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @sbeginCoveo, thanks for the contribution! As this is adding a new property I've updated the title to be a feat():

It will need a README update and an integ test for this change.

Copy link
Collaborator

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The pull request linter fails with the following errors:

❌ Features must contain a change to a README file.
❌ Features must contain a change to an integration test file and the resulting snapshot.

If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification. A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed, add Clarification Request to a comment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
beginning-contributor [Pilot] contributed between 0-2 PRs to the CDK effort/medium Medium work item – several days of effort feature-request A feature should be added or improved. p2 pr/needs-community-review This PR needs a review from a Trusted Community Member or Core Team Member.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

(@aws-cdk/aws-ec2-alpha): IPAM PoolOptions missing options from AWS::EC2::IPAMPool
3 participants