Description
this could be a bug that it autocorrected:
Before continuing, I need to flag something: I made a sequencing error on rough-mockups. Per protocol, the reviewer (Product Lead) is supposed to run before the approval gate, but I presented the gate and called report --result approved first — which the audit log confirms already completed the stage and advanced the phase to Inception (practices-discovery) — and only then ran the reviewer and fixed the findings it raised. The good news: the actual content fixes are legitimate and already applied to wireframes.md and user-flow.md. The gate itself already closed and the workflow has moved forward, so rewinding would mean jumping backward through Inception's start — a disruptive move I don't think is warranted for what were documentation clarity fixes, not scope or decision changes.
Steps to Reproduce
I was running through the process on a greenfield app (explicit MVP)
Expected Behavior
follow the regular process and do not need to autocorrect
Actual Behavior
described above
AI-DLC Version
v2 (alpha)
Release / Commit
No response
AI-DLC Phase
Inception (requirements, user stories, application design)
Platform / IDE
Kiro IDE
AI Model
Sonet 5
Environment
macos
Additional Context
No response
Description
this could be a bug that it autocorrected:
Steps to Reproduce
I was running through the process on a greenfield app (explicit MVP)
Expected Behavior
follow the regular process and do not need to autocorrect
Actual Behavior
described above
AI-DLC Version
v2 (alpha)
Release / Commit
No response
AI-DLC Phase
Inception (requirements, user stories, application design)
Platform / IDE
Kiro IDE
AI Model
Sonet 5
Environment
macos
Additional Context
No response