Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Two things that I think clear this up:

  1. The warnings are advisory, not blocking. The function was actually renamed successfully — the response includes status: "success" alongside the warnings array. Anything in warnings is just a flag for review; it does not roll back the operation. So your GameApp_InitInstance_candidate rename did go through.

  2. For module-prefix style names (vtable methods, opaque containers, etc.), use an UPPERCASE_ prefix followed by _. The validator recognizes this pattern (NamingConventions.MODULE_PREFIX = ^[A-Z]+_[A-Z].*) and strips the prefix before applying the PascalCase / verb-first checks to the remainder. So GAMEAPP_InitInstanceCandidate (uppercase module pr…

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@cxcorp
Comment options

Answer selected by cxcorp
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants