Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
111 lines (85 loc) · 5.43 KB

File metadata and controls

111 lines (85 loc) · 5.43 KB

Clanker - the ecosystem Sparkz graduates onto

Researched 2026-07-23. Primary sources where possible; secondary reporting marked. Numbers here are meant to be quotable in the Sparkz transparency surfaces.

What Clanker is

A token deployment protocol on Base (also Arbitrum, Monad, BNB, Ethereum). Its AI agent launches a tradable token when you mention @clanker in a Farcaster cast; it also has a web UI and a TypeScript SDK. Founded by Jack Dishman (@dish), a Farcaster engineer, with Proxy (@proxystudio.eth). Launched November 2024 (some sources say Nov 2023

  • treat the exact month as unconfirmed).

Three deployment paths: the Farcaster bot, clanker.world/deploy, and clanker-sdk.

Ownership chain (this matters)

  1. October 2025 - Farcaster acquired Clanker. CLANKER rose ~350-360% that week.
  2. January 2026 - Neynar acquired Farcaster (see the Farcaster doc). So Clanker is now owned by Neynar, via Farcaster.

Implication for Sparkz: the token rail, the social protocol, and the dominant infra provider are now one company. That is convenient (tight integration) and a concentration risk (one vendor across identity, distribution, and token issuance). Sparkz's adapter seams are the hedge - keep the rails swappable.

Fees and creator rewards (v4, exact)

Source: Clanker docs, "Creator rewards and fees".

  • The protocol takes a fixed 20% of LP fees at the pool level.

  • The creator picks a fee tier; the protocol takes 20% of that:

    Creator fee Protocol Total swap fee
    1% 0.2% 1.2%
    2% 0.4% 2.4%
    3% 0.6% 3.6%

    Formula: CreatorFee * 0.2 = protocol take.

  • Rewards are claimed from the token's admin page on clanker.world.

  • Disclose this gotcha: creators earn only on the initial LP. "Token creators will not earn any rewards" from secondary pools or user-deposited LP.

  • History: v3.1 and earlier took up to 0.6% (WETH or project token); v4 moved to 0.2% WETH-only. Fee control was later handed permanently to creators (claim or burn).

CLANKER token economics

  • After the Farcaster acquisition, two-thirds of current and future protocol fees buy and hold CLANKER; the remaining third is kept in USDC for tax/ops. (Reported: one day's buy was ~$65k.)
  • ~7% of supply was locked in one-sided liquidity to deepen markets.
  • Clanker Ecosystem Fund recycles protocol fees to builders - $8M deployed to buy 14% of CLANKER supply, with future fees earmarked for infrastructure and community across Clanker and Farcaster.

Read: the protocol is explicitly designed so usage accrues to CLANKER holders. If Sparkz routes volume onto Clanker, it is feeding that flywheel. Fine - but say it out loud in the transparency panel rather than letting a creator discover it.

Traction

  • Over $50M in cumulative protocol fees since inception.
  • Fourth-largest protocol on Base by weekly revenue (as reported).
  • Thousands of tokens deployed across chains.

This is the strongest argument for graduating onto Clanker rather than rolling our own: it is a real, revenue-generating, audited rail with liquidity plumbing solved.

V5 status

  • Not shipped. clanker-sdk latest is v4.2.18 (July 8, 2026); no v5 release or branch. The DOCS repo still treats V4 as current; no public V5/B20 docs.
  • Sent to audit ~June 25; ships with B20 as the default standard.
  • See clanker-v5-b20-research.md (in docs/notes/) for the full B20 breakdown - including the admin-role/freeze-and-seize question that decides whether a "creator coin" is actually creator-owned.

Droids - the token-funded agent

  • "An AI agent attached to a Clanker token. It has its own Farcaster account, casts and replies in a voice you write, and is funded by the token itself."
  • Human-in-the-loop by design: "You approve every cast, replies happen on its own in persona, and the droid's wallet is sandboxed."
  • Funding: a carve-out of the token's LP rewards pays inference. Default 1000 bps (10%), configurable 1%-50% at launch, from the largest paired-token reward slot.
  • Runs dry -> Insufficient USDC runway, droid stops until topped up. Anyone can top it up with USDC on Base, and the carve-out can be routed to an arbitrary contract (a treasury or splitter).
  • Limits: replies stop 5 levels deep; fresh mentions from the last 30 minutes; replies in authored threads last 24 hours.
  • No BYOK documented. FID ownership is not clarified in the docs.

Three takeaways for Sparkz

  1. The droid model is the "cheeky intern" pattern (reply-autonomous, cast-approved) - our agent's human-in-the-loop default already agrees with it.
  2. The carve-out can be pointed at a Capsule's 0xSplits treasury - a clean integration point.
  3. The gap we own: droid funding requires LP rewards, so it cannot fund an agent before a token exists. A tokenless spark has no LP to carve. Pre-token agent funding (BYOK or otherwise) is exactly the Sparkz-shaped hole.

Open questions for the Farcaster space

  1. On a V5 (B20) deployment, who holds the admin roles - Clanker, the creator, or nobody? Can Sparkz launch admin-less (initialAdmin == address(0))?
  2. Droids: who owns the FID, and is BYOK on the roadmap for the pre-token case?
  3. Does the 20%-of-creator-fee protocol take change in V5?
  4. Any interface-partner program (a revenue share for a launcher like Sparkz), and what would Sparkz be permitted to publish about it?