Naming convention

[sakulstra]

Proposal naming

Currently proposal names are somewhat arbitrary and tend to overlap (especially with the recent mass of cap update proposals). Therefore it might make sense to define a naming schema including:

• some temporal

• chain

• pool? (not sure as a proposal might touch multiple pool)

• author? (not sure as might be collaborative)

• topic? (might be complicated when doing multiple things)

• A schema should be defined and documented on the readme.

Optional Generator:

Probably would make sense to add a generator so it's easier to follow the new convention. Also might make sense to seed generated files with some template. With the new config engine one might even consider a inquirer like prompt to generate proposals.