Skip to content

bedpostx stick component concatenation #93

Open
@Lestropie

Description

@Lestropie

Contemplating how best to demonstrate bedpostx stick orientations during #92.

Something I realised early on is the contrast in precedent between having 3-vector images with multiple orientations stored as triplets, versus no such precedent for orientations stored in spherical coordinates and instead splitting them across files. Indeed bedpostx goes even further in the other direction, splitting each spherical coordinate between two files.

However the expectation currently being set by the BEP, being not only concatenation of polar angles to form spherical coordinates but also concatenation across multiple orientations, could possibly be disliked. I do think it should be supported by the specification, but perhaps not what is used for the demonstrative example. The multiple stick components should maybe instead be split across images. I don't think that it should be permissible to keep the two polar angles split between two images---since they can't be interpreted in isolation and need to be grouped to encapsulate the appropriate encoding---but having one spherical coordinate image and one volume fraction image per stick would both be consistent with the rest of the specification in terms of separate representation of separate compartments in a multi-compartment model, but also require less manipulation to get from a bedpostx output to a BIDS-compliant dataset.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions