@@ -956,15 +956,19 @@ EMGGround:
956956 Description of the location of the ground electrode
957957 (for example, `"placed on right styloid process"`).
958958 type : string
959- # TODO do we want `EMGPlacementScheme`? It seems to make sense for things like SENIAM
960- # but not when a defined coordinate system is used. That seems to suggest a rule that
961- # the dataset must EITHER define EMGPlacementScheme OR define EMGCoordinateSystem, but
962- # presumably not both?
963- EMGPlacementScheme :
964- name : EMGPlacementScheme
965- display_name : EMG Placement Scheme
966- description : |
967- The name of a standardized placement system (for example, `"SENIAM 8"`).
959+ EMGPlacement :
960+ name : EMGPlacement
961+ display_name : EMG Placement Procedure
962+ description : |
963+ The name of a standardized electrode placement procedure (for example, `"SENIAM 8"`)
964+ or a description of the procedure used.
965+ Descriptions SHOULD reflect the process used by the researcher(s) when placing electrodes,
966+ and SHOULD NOT simply give the name of the targeted muscle (use `TargetMuscle` for that).
967+ For example, EMG electrode sites may be chosen by visual reference to target muscles,
968+ by palpation of the skin to locate target muscles, by functional localization
969+ (temporary electrode placement at several sites during prescribed behavior,
970+ until a site yielding strong EMG signal is found), or by measured distances
971+ (either absolute or proportional) relative to skeletal landmarks.
968972 type : string
969973# TODO: so far this is just copy/paste from EEGReference
970974EMGReference :
0 commit comments