Skip to content

Rules for expressing intent of B1+/- field maps #2188

@tsalo

Description

@tsalo

There are currently no rules regarding how to express the intent of RF fieldmaps (B1+/B1-). I don't actually know if B1 field maps are typically paired to individual structural images or not, so this may not be a problem (though we should be explicit in the text if that's the case). If it is useful to link B1 field maps to target images, then we may want to introduce something like B1PlusFieldIdentifier/B1MinusFieldIdentifier and B1PlusFieldSource/B1MinusFieldSource.

This came up in #2183.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions